Those discussions are inevitable. But it's better to have them about the use of a post than about the technicalities of the phrasing of a written rule.
You can't get insured for this without already having robust IT security in place. Both are viewed as a largely pointless expense by far too many old C-Level suits (who will make off with a neat bonus for their failure).
Mercedes too. An E300 used to have 300cm³ of displacement.
Still it's better this way. People demanding huge displacement values for no fucking reason when technology has long moved on are among the dumbest on the planet.
At work we were upgraded to 16GB last cycle. 8GB would've been plenty if not for all the shit that forcibly runs in the background. Now even the 16GB models are struggling, and I mean struggling sometimes. While my userspace apps use less than 2GB.
This was your position: "we have 'quala' (consciousness)" in regards to humans. That's what I've challenged in my reply.
Now you've wildly moved the goalposts twice in just two comments. The first (solipsism) I've rejected, but gave you the benefit of the doubt that you just needed a reminder on your own position.
Now you did it again. I'm not playing this game. Stick to a point, anything else is just rudely wasting the time of people actually interested in having a good-faith exchange of ideas.
No you're absolutely not. Allowing this in a community is tacit agreement with discriminatory attitudes against queer people.