Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
3
Comments
598
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Totally the wrong place in the thread, but I think just going to the Library, proving that you are from the future with some basic knowledge of chemistry, and telling them that they need a backup in the caves of the Sinai Desert would probably be my go-to. Give them some pointers on multi-millennium document storage.

  • That was less for you than for the people who come after, still ignorant of the crimes of Edison. A just world would not even remember Edison's name.

  • and was inarguably the better inventor and thinker, since Edison was a plagiarist and marketer who made incremental changes to the designs of other people, and nothing more

    FTFY

  • Nah, that's Clint's great(x15) grandfather, Ea-Nasir

  • Ooh, interesting! Perhaps if you cooled the top and heated the bottom quickly enough? The biggest problem is that the convective drag needs to be high enough to cause actual subduction. In my Earth Science class, I just add mica powder to water, heat it from below, and show them Rayleigh-Benard convection cells.

  • We do get cracks. They're the divergent plate boundaries. Water and ice just flow on time scales far too dissimilar to make an appropriate rate model at the cracks.

  • Haha, the Hammer of Angantyr.

  • Hey, sure, singlet fluorine is real bad, but even diatomic fluorine is only barely less reactive than singlet.

  • Even better: certain comics written and drawn by citizens of the US.

  • Ah, I got one who just repeated that same thing three times, then wrote me a bad poem when requested. It was... Enlightening

  • Jesus, seriously? Think I can get it to write me a poem about onions? I caught one just a couple days ago. How do you even know?

  • I wish that only good takes and true statements would get upvoted. Perhaps I am still traumatized from my Reddit days. I am heartened to hear that you were being sarcastic. I don't go by upvotes when assessing intent. All that Poe's law says is that if you say something sarcastically, someone WILL believe you are being genuine. All I ask is for a simple /s for us neurodivergent folks. Not everyone is capable of reading the mind of a person based on seven words which directly and clearly agree with a piece of propaganda (propaganda that the majority of my home country has swallowed, bait, line, sinker and pole). It is all-too-believable to think that someone would support it and be upvoted by people who believe they are being sarcastic, especially when the only extant reply was someone ostensibly agreeing with the content of your message, saying "Exactly, thank you".

  • Yeah, let's completely ignore the ridiculously illegal and perpetual reign of terror as Israel claws away the civilians of Gaza by any means they please, such as the ever-so-friendly White Phosphorus rain they gifted the Palestinians in 2009 as but a single example out of the countless others.

    If this is sarcastic, you are deeply on the wrong side of Poe's law here. I really hope this is sarcasm.

  • Too true.

  • This belongs in uplifting news

  • Indeed. The law doesn't protect people. People protect the law.

  • Came here for this

  • 80% certain that's Quentin Tarantino, or were you talking about Brad Pitt? Actually, I now see that they are all wearing black shirts, so maybe you're talking about Leonardo DiCaprio?