When I lived in Germany I found that the people were far more self-policing than Americans. There just seemed to be a general attitude of, "we know we're not supposed to do that, so we don't."
Fully anecdotal, sure, and that was 15 years ago, but nonetheless it's hard for me to imagine "ze Germans" tampering with odometers to sell cars.
I agree with you, the "unimportant" part was tongue in cheek. My point really is that if a person wants a job done for money, they need to either pay a living wage or admit that the work isn't important enough to pay for. There shouldn't be an in-between for people to take advantage of.
Then we make two wages, one we call minimum, the other we call living. That way it's easy to know if a place is offering a living wage or if it's just unimportant work.
In the first televised presidential debate in 1960, radio listeners said that Nixon won, but TV viewers thought he looked thin and sallow compared to Kennedy's youthful vigor and gave JFK the edge.
Appearance has played a big role in politics ever since.
Thanks for that. Having read it, though, I think it's likely that I'll forget about the details soon enough to continue nothing-ing her comics. The whole argument feels silly from the periphery.
Ha, okay, but you're still not allowed to put the secrets on the non-secret computer, regardless of what kind of encryption, because there's a whole different system for that.
I promise I'm not completely stupid, but the first time I saw an ad I went looking for ways to never see them again and came up with nothing. I'll look again, though!
It's a particularly bland style