The main advantage of fediverse over, let's say X, is that you can change server if you find owner not trustworthy. So just do it, it's exactly why it was designed in this way, to let you do it easily.
But talking about funding... I might indeed reconsider doing this...
Cloud. Windows is going to be sold as remotely accessible virtual machine hosted on Azure. The change will first take place in government offices, then in companies, and finally (after people get used to it at work) among consumers.
Why would gov and enterprise like it? Because of:
safety - all enterprise data will be stored on Azure servers and won't ever leave it. It makes preventing data leakage so much easier
maintenance - software updates can be applied even outside of working hours, Microsoft could launch VMs and update at any time
ease of upgrade - need better specs? you don't need to buy better hardware anymore, you just buy better subscription. Hardware won't become obsolete anymore that quickly
Consumers will also like it. No need to pay hundreds of dollars for new GPU when you just want to play newly released game. Also, all your data accessible from anywhere in the world.
And why Microsoft would like it? Kinda obvious, it would be even harder for users to quit a subscription, they will be tied to ecosystem even more
Yes, sounds ridiculous, but how will this ratio change if we take into account the cost of hiring a programmer and the costs of implementation of a niche feature that this experiment provides at a cost of LLM inference?
Also: we can cache and reuse enpoint implementation.
I believe the same thing was said about the Internet in the ’90s: “It speeds up communication, but how would anyone earn money from it?”
Although I don’t think we’re anywhere close to AGI or anything like that, current AI development fundamentally changes a few things in our lives: how we find and process information (information retrieval works very well), how we interact with computers (using natural language instead of clicking through interfaces), and how productive we are.
Video generation models are going to bring entertainment to a whole new level. A single person can now create an entire movie without even buying a camera. Entire game development studios can build worlds larger than ever before. Text generation makes disinformation and propaganda insanely cheap and effective. Surveillance will be much easier now, as owning a communication platform not only allows you to search for messages by phrase but also by meaning. Ads will be far more personalized, as AI chat platforms now know us much better than Google — the current leader in this field.
So how dangerous is that really? I assume one day we’ll finally see investors saying, “Nah, that’s a bubble. I’m not gonna see any returns from those companies - I’m selling.” Then stock prices will fall, and some investors will lose money by selling for less than they bought. After that, AI unicorns will start to lose funding and close their businesses, laying off people.
But will I - a person who does not work in the AI industry and has not invested in AI companies - be affected by this?
I wish there was something like this for tags. So: display only posts that contain tag X, but sort them with some algorithm. Ideally: steered by number of likes and date of adding. May be even the same that is used by Lemmy.
Usefulness really comes down to which model is being used. I've noticed most developers choose GPT for Copilot because that's what they are familiar with (or they often don't have a choice due to company policy). I recommend to try Claude Sonnet. How it works is true magic.
But I agree, repetitive tasks is what it should be used for. Planning is still programmer's job
Please add some context for someone not up to date with all that jargon. There is a trend here and on hacker news to just post a model name that says basically nothing and I often just don't even know why I should care. Or maybe I shouldn't?
I'm wondering what exactly caused so many downvotes? Isn't video about updates to the most popular programming editor not suitable for community named "programming"?
Software you create with LLMs is deterministic, because it is the same code as you produce manually. The process of creating it is maybe not, but it is a task of a programmer to review it before publishing it.
AI is just an even higher level of abstraction. Just like we've replaced assembly with C (so we won't need to know how processors work internally), and then C with some higher-level languages (so we could stop care about allocating memory that much), now we are replacing those higher-level languages with natural language (to stop wasting time on learning syntax of frameworks).
Does it mean programming jobs are obsolete? Of course not. Because programming was never about writing code. It has always been about translating requirements into actual software solutions.
I believe single binary compilation is not that uncommon these days. You can do that with Go or C#. Apart from obvious ones like c++.
I mean, I don't want to discourage you, but from my experience choosing not popular language is not a good Idea if you want to actually accomplish something
I don't think it has anything to do with vibe coding, the problem with MCP is just it needed to be done fast (because otherwise another protocol would appear and get all the hype) and needed to be very easy to use for hobbyists (again: to get hype, Enterprise software is boring)
The main advantage of fediverse over, let's say X, is that you can change server if you find owner not trustworthy. So just do it, it's exactly why it was designed in this way, to let you do it easily.
But talking about funding... I might indeed reconsider doing this...