The thing I take issue with is that now that things finally seem to be turning around
They aren't turning around. They're getting much much worse. The hill Dems have to climb in '26 is so much higher than in '18 or '06 or '92.
The stakes are higher. Which means Dems have more to win in the long run, if they can take control of a failing economy and deliver on reforms they've been promising since the 1940s.
But after Clinton and then Obama and then Biden all pooched historic opportunities, faith in the establishment is at an all time low.
So instead of saying Dems don’t have the numbers, why not say “this is why it’s so important to vote in November”?
Because it's hack, for starters. Which year was voting not important?
And because it ignores what is being voted for.
If you're putting up another class of Blue Dogs and Neocons, the country is fucked no matter who wins. The policies won't change, just the branding.
Talking about who actually makes up the Democrat Party is more important than talking about Voting Blue No Matter Who. Dems could sweep every available seat in November and still flounder next January.
Just look at what happened to Starmer's Labour Party. Historic win. Massive popular mandate. All anyone got was Fascism Lite. They paved the way for Nigel Farrage.
This is exactly what people have been begging for from the DNC.
Idk about "begging" so much as "primarying incumbents".
And now it’s “oh but they don’t have the numbers to actually achieve anything”?
In the national legislature they don't.
In state legislatures and municipal governments, they absolutely do. And what's blowing up careers, while producing a wave of Platners and El-Sayeds to replace them has been do-nothing liberals losing the mandate of their constituents.
Andrew Cuomo's done. Gavin Newsom's career is pretty much cooked, unless he runs as a Republican. Tim Walz is leaving office in disgrace over the failure to stand up for his constituents. It's a bloodbath for liberal veterans.
progressives who want it entirely dismantled with no replacement
ICE was a post-9/11 invention of the Bush Administration. To believe we absolutely need a paramilitary dedicated to funneling millions of people into concentration camps on spurious allegations and threadbare charges, you need to have already ingested a ton of hysterical fascist slop.
If you want to defend ICE's existence, put up an argument for it's continued function. Why do we need tens of thousands of armed thugs storming into cities and dragging people out of green card hearings by their hair?
If we could fix those issues
You'd still have a Gestapo full of armed reactionaries on the government payroll.
What you're talking about is akin to reforming the Army of the Confederacy or the Khmer Rouge.
Farage has re-won his seat, receiving more than 22,000 votes in Clacton, on the Essex coast.
Binface had his highest share yet with 9,455 votes
Reminds me of the Obama Senate run in '04, where he was running against Allen Keyes and the people who voted for Keyes were used to define the term "Crazification Factor"
Really speaks to the state of British politics when you can lose an election by 30-pts and get excited about it.
Incidentally, reading speeches from George Bush Jr in 2026 really recalibrates my expectations for the country long-term. So easy to forget that this guy was an utterly brainless, dry-drunk, failson bigot, after his reputation got glazed through the Obama/Trump Era.
the GOP can continue to score bitching points with their base
The joke of the last 30 years has been the GOP crying "The media is against us!" through louder and larger corporate media megaphones with every passing election cycle.
But the punchline is that bitching about the media being mean is now a central function of federal government. Nothing fucking works because all the top leadership positions are occupied by professional whiners.
Company A starts what we’ve discovered is essentially an inbreeding program, with extra steps.
The Habsburgs prove you can keep grinding on for a while even when you're inbreed to shit. But the notion that you need to inbreed in order to get ahead in business is borderline superstitious. Rather, large and entrenched businesses have the luxury of doing this inbred bullshit so long as their social networks can support a steady business income from monopolized industry and captured markets.
