There have been many things he's done already that are unconstitutional, and the only response from the Dems are "Well, wait for the election gais, I swear!!"
We’re rapidly approaching several possible tipping points that will “rapidly” (over decades or a century) make many of the most populated parts of the world much less livable, disrupt agriculture on a global scale, cause mass die offs, disrupt water supplies and weather patterns.
I agree with this statement. Those "tipping points" however can be walked back, by doing things like actually repairing the damage we've done, instead of just reducing the amount of damage.
The only thing “saving” us is the uncertainty: we’re not good at predicting them yet (since they’ve never happened in the history of the earth) so we don’t know how desperate we need to be
I can make one prediction with near 100% certainty: As long as we maintain out current economic model, human life on this planet will likely cease to exist within the next couple hundred years.
All these things had to have happened in the mid 90s at the latest
Wrong, If you are correct, though, the only correct way to proceed is to completely exterminate all human life on the planet, since we are obviously the problem.
What we are long past is maintaining the current level of consumption the western world does, and maintain current climate.
Note, the only ones reducing consumption and pollution of the working class. Jeff Bezos still dumps tons of carbon into the air needlessly, just to go golfing.
Those are indeed much better examples of changes we need but we are rapidly approaching the point where those changes are too late.
That is a myth. We are not past the point of healing the planet. If we are, then we should just self-exterminate, so the planet can heal itself, which it will, once we're gone.
We're past the point of maintaining the current consumption model of western nations, and maintaining a status quo, or return, to pre-industrialization levels of pollution.
Blocking sunlight? Like the one nearly limitless energy source we have?
How about stuff like... Planting more trees, ending deforestation of the Amazon? How about reducing automobile usage?
Like, these all have no negative impacts, but blocking the sun does, in fact.
Plants don't use heat to make energy, they use sunlight. And you're discussing cutting off the energy source of the one type organism capable of cleaning our atmo...
How often do you think they derail, or bridges go out?
I think over the last decade, I've heard of one incident.