Skip Navigation

Posts
24
Comments
340
Joined
2 yr. ago

Runterwählen ist kein Gegenargument.

[Verifying my cryptographic key: openpgp4fpr:941D456ED3A38A3B1DBEAB2BC8A2CCD4F1AE5C21]

  • I wish Usenet wasn‘t misunderstood as a file sharing network anymore.

  • AI bros are worse than Hitler

  • Depends on the task. SVN or Fossil (if you need a web interface) for cathedral-style, Mercurial for bazaar-style, I’d say. Especially because of their easy to understand UX.

    1. Git is for bazaar-style development. However, most of my own projects are cathedral-style.
    2. Git’s default user experience (CLI command syntax, for example) is weird. There are reasons why Git GUIs are popular and (e.g.) SVN GUIs never were.
    3. Git is rather spammy in terms of hard disk usage.
  • There are better backends though.

  • Both suck

  • No

  • I thought they had stopped development? Have t checked them in a decade.

  • I imagine Gimp users revolting if it ever improves a lot.

  • Krita is also more of a Paint.NET than a Photoshop replacement.

  • And UI usability.

  • Honestly, GIMP is not a good alternative to Photoshop. I know, "it's free" is enough for many people, but it ... just isn't.

  • I hope there’s no Google in my life.

  • I'm not sure whether it could be worse.

  • I am one of those weirdos who prefer the best tool for a job, not the most popular one. And Git is - for me and my projects with exactly one branch ("trunk") and three or four other contributors, with me being the BDFL - the worst choice.

  • It sure is! Glad I'm not alone. :-)

  • Makes sense.

  • Which VCS capabilities make Git stand out in comparison to all other DVCSs if you don’t need a web UI?