She's still married to him. If he loses the election and the Republican party turns against him, and if he ends up having to pay half a billion in damages from his court cases, she'll run to the media with some sob story about how she felt she couldn't leave him sooner.
He's mad cause the Democrats are absolutely crushing it. They went from being over 3 points behind in most polls with Biden, to now being almost 4 points ahead on average. He's ignored the advice of all his campaign advisors... he really couldn't help himself. Now he's relying on Elon to help him "win" the election and it isn't working as expected. All they have left it is perpetuate conspiracies & lies and hope that Twitter (X) has enough reach to change the outcome of the election. Musk isn't even hiding that he's manipulating the algorithms and allowing bots to run rampant anymore. THAT is their strategy to try to win. If he loses then Musk will immediately try to sell if he can, but X is now worth a small fraction of what he paid for it. I'd be surprised if he could get 2 billion for it. This was in 2023:
I agree... however, that is an issue with the content creators relying on using content promotions. I have noticed when skipping ahead in videos that it usually indicates in the progress bar where the promotion ends. If the content producers utilized other ways to contribute and I liked them enough, then I'd do that. YouTube now has a subscriber only feature that should help with this. There are also extensions that are supposed to block sponsors too. I don't think YouTube has implemented any functions to make blocking sponsored ads more difficult, especially for paying users... who knows though.
But you’re not. You’ve made several comments on this post criticizing the people who 1. want control over their own devices and 2. are sick of ads being forced into every aspect of their lives.
They have control over their devices. You're not making sense and can't even articulate how they don't have control. If they want even more control, they can install GrapheneOS or a plethora of third party ROMs that removes all Google services. Apple users can't even do that. No one is making them use YouTube either. Google allows third party apps that blocks ads. It isn't like a... "Ha, Google you're idiots we are smarter than you cause you are too stupid to block ads." Seriously, what kind of dumb person takes this attitude?
And I happen to think that a company throwing such an entitled fit over money, when they are making an immoral amount of profit that is increasing YoY, is super relevant when discussing the profitability of one of their services.
Dumb users are the ones throwing an entitled fit. Why is making profit immoral? If you want to say, "I'm anti-capitalist and don't think the world should be about money..." then just say that. It is a much stronger argument and one that should be discussed more, but singling out Google is dumb. In terms of ethics, they are still way better than most companies, including Apple & Microsoft... In what realitydoes it make sense to attack the more ethical companies before going after the least ethical?
YouTube doesn’t owe you cause they made profit
Read your previous comment.
People always complain when their convenience is removed from them. Welcome to the human condition.
Not always. If I go to a coffee shop and they give me a free one out of convenience... I don't go back and demand they keep giving them to me for free cause they did it once.
I can understand why people circumvent them too. I can't understand why they'd claim... "Hey Google, you suck at blocking ads. You can't stop us from doing it."
Seriously, fuck people that do this. Google knows people use third party apps that block ads. They might as well say... we're not happy not having ads. We want Google to block it entirely so we can be even more pissed off.
I don't care if you use ad blockers. I get annoyed when people publish articles like... "Google is losing the adblockers war" cause then advertisers are going to start pushing harder for Google to actually prevent adblockers entirely, which they could have done already. Thus far Google, despite issues, does quite a lot of good things... Android is the only open source OS out of Apple & Windows. Android lets you install third party app stores. Chrome (Chromium) is open source... etc.
These users writing this content don't even develop the apps to block YouTube ads. If you've ever explored the APIs by YouTube, then you'd know that Google despite pushing ads for users without blockers, is still rather friendly to third party apps.
I'm sorry... I didn't realize the reason that there are so many Starbucks in America, like literally caddy corner from one another is because their customer base is the "privileged minority." I'll have to remember that line.
In all seriousness, you could argue that ads prey on poor vulnerable people unable to afford YouTube Premium that just want to use it to learn, and that would be a semi-coherent argument.
Netflix has ads now? I thought that was only for their lower tier service? I had to cancel Netflix cause they haven't came out with two more seasons of Stranger Things yet.
People don't use NZBGet for that reason. It is literally a platform & distribution model primarily intended for pirating content in a way that is much quicker and more reliable than torrents. Usenet would probably have died without NZBs.
Well... if your idea of "free" content is something you don't pay for then yes, but if your idea of free content is something that was intended to be distributed for "free" then no.
My dude... There are 100s of legitimate things about Google to complain about, but you pick the weakest argument and then say I'm white knighting them. YouTube doesn't owe you cause they made profit... you've been able to still bypass their ads for this long, and so now users are complaining that they were able to circumvent something easier in the past?
The comment where everything's made up and the points don't matter