I'm not really familiar with Rubber ducky and just quickly searched the web. So it is a tool to create tests? Or what is it exactly? Is it an Ai tool? Can it read the entire code or documentation base and then pretend to be a student or developer that asks you questions about it?
I am not down playing the other issues it has, like licensing, cost, environmental impact, dependency and privacy issues. These are still an issue with such an online LLM tool. But that is not the point of my post and does not take away about a "good" use case. In my opinion.
If I listened to you, then I would never try Vim and never understood how wonderful it is. Before that, i thought Vim is ugly and dumb. Why would anyone use Vim? Someday I had enough of the bullshit with the GUI tools and tried out this mystical Vim... and fall in love. Whenever I use a non Vim editor, it feels lacking, it feels holding me back. Or more specifically, I like to think how a Vim user thinks with combining the keys (wcw to replace next word in example).
Lot of people like using Vim. Just because you didn't like it does not mean we should stop recommending or bringing it up. Let people try and find their own opinion, do not force your opinion on others.
There is one in Neovim that might interest you. It opens up the current file content you edit in a new web browser, Firefox in example. The cool thing is, it is also synchronizing the current position of the document in Neovim and the browser view. I don't need that functionality, but found it very cool.
The thing is, Markdown is just regular text. So there is no real need for a dedicated editor. In example I edit and write Markdown files with Vim. Maybe you can install a plugin to help a little bit, but there is no need for.
Because Fedora likes to adapt the newest stuff very early. While it's not like "very early" for BTRFS anymore, its still exceptional unusual to have it as the default in a mainstream distribution. And they want to benefit from the feature set of BTRFS, so it makes sense to use it as the default. Why shouldn't the mainstream benefit from quick snapshots and backups? I don't see the argument "are catering to mainstream audience" as to not use BTRFS?
I would say, if you want benefit from the features of BTRFS, then go for it. But you have to read a bit what it can do, and use tools and set it up to get the most out of it I think. EXT4 on the other hand is proven and is a setup and forget experience. I chose EXT4 when installing EndeavourOS, because I read a few things about BTRFS that made me think twice and also I don't need the features too. So, if you don't know and have to ask the community, then the best would be to us EXT4, unless you know why you want to have BTRFS features.
I assume they did that for performance reasons, because removing entries is slow probably? From user perspective, it would have made it more sense to remove the key instead defining it as nil and then expecting the user to handle the nil. The key does not stop existing, right? I don't program in Lua.
I'm not really familiar with Rubber ducky and just quickly searched the web. So it is a tool to create tests? Or what is it exactly? Is it an Ai tool? Can it read the entire code or documentation base and then pretend to be a student or developer that asks you questions about it?
I am not down playing the other issues it has, like licensing, cost, environmental impact, dependency and privacy issues. These are still an issue with such an online LLM tool. But that is not the point of my post and does not take away about a "good" use case. In my opinion.