Functionality changes, community and users are changing and off course the leadership, rights and branding changed. Right, I think its fair to distinguish the Musk era with his X branding, from the legacy Twitter. So I give you that.
In order to not break user setups, we kept these repositories around in an unused and empty state.
suggest that the empty and unused repositories have no effect. I don't know why they kept this, because removing them would break back then. Removing them now breaks it today, so not sure why they delayed that, as nothing is won. I will uncomment out (Edit: I meant I will comment out) those lines and see what happens. :D In worst case the system cannot update and I can reverse the change. But there is no reason why the system should not able to update, if the repositories are empty.
Another Edit: Me dummy don't have any [community] repository. Not sure if I removed it before (very possible) or if it is removed by my distribution (please don't hurt me, I'm just using EndeavourOS).
Last 6 Months: I don't know when, but Mint finally beat the "extremely popular" distribution MX Linux. Good to see that EndeavourOS is right after it on place 3. Ubuntu still not very popular on place 8, but might climb up soon after the new release. Archlinux is on place 67, because nobody uses it; even Gentoo is more popular on place 63.
Similarly, there's a strong possibility that GIMP 3.0 will be included with Ubuntu 25.04, as the third (and final) release candidate (RC3) has appeared
So you don't even have a single example. Well I consider your post as useless and spam. Please stop posting useless and spam like this. Edit: Also you still don't answer a single question. Who is the judge? Who do I ask if my posts are okay to post? You?
Don't make this a personal attack. Do you have any article you consider to be shitty? As an example, so we are on the same page. Do you ever wrote them a message or did an issue, so they are aware of the issue and can correct the mistake? Do you think they read this post of you and stop posting, because you do not agree with what they consider to be useful?
Sorry but, you are not the person who decides who can post and who cannot. I have seen shitty articles that others find useful, and I saw good articles that others find shitty. Do you get what I mean?
That does not answer my question. Who is judging what is bad and shitty guides, and who has the necessary experience? I disagree with you. Let people write articles that YOU think are shitty. Beginners or professional grade knowledge, I am for the open web where noobs share their knowledge as well. Assuming they are written by a human, not talking about Ai.
Do you have any article as an example what you consider shitty and you do not allow to be posted on the free web?
The question is, who decides what shitty guide is. You? Let people write what they want, you don't have to use or read it. Also why not tell those you write shitty guides and tell them what is shitty, so they can improve. Instead trash talk on an unrelated forum??
If you want debug code, then hopefully it isn't written by an Ai agent. Otherwise good luck (besides simple functions or code blocks off course).