I'm a huuuge fan of RetroArch and have setup over 80 cores :D. I only use standalone emulators for cores that are not available in RetroArch (such as Yuzu and RPCS3).
The article itself is a bit bare bones though. Here is the official installation documentation for Linux: https://docs.libretro.com/guides/install-gnu/ I personally have it installed through the official Archlinux package, but they are slow on updating it. Its more than a month now and they still are on an older version. Bleeding Edge? Who says that! It's the reason why I think to switch to the Flatpak version, maybe, maybe not.
When you install it through the official package in Archlinux, you have to change some paths in the settings where cores are saved. That way you can use the RetroArch internal update, so it can download and install cores in the directory you want. Because if you install RetroArch from official package, its managed and installed in a directory the normal user have no access without sudo. I changed the cores path to "~/.config/retroarch/cores". Note, Flatpak has its own file structure and paths, so do not do this with that.
There is also an official RetroArch version for Steam. I use that on my Steam Deck. The good thing is, its always up to date on day one release of RetroArch. And it has Cloud Save support for save files of games. Negative is, that not all cores are supported. However you can install them manually in the cores directory, but then you have to update it manually too if you do that. I also have my own custom controls and menus for RetroArch on Steam Deck, but not uploaded it yet. Really really need to do this...
I don't see a problem. If someone forks it and changes the license to some proprietary, then their fork is proprietary. The original software is still Open Source. People act like as if the original license changed.
What issue do people have with the sudo-rs license? Its Free and Open Source. I think its more like people having an issue with the language Rust and just search excuses to be mad at.
Yes you can and should upgrade, which is what I was trying to say really. It’s less set and forget as in “just let it update and it will keep on trucking for 10 years”.
At least with rolling releases this is not needed. You only install once, and only update this one version basically. EndeavourOS and Arch based distributions are like that. So its basically support without end, which beats Windows in that regard. :-) These are normal desktop systems BTW, not Enterprise.
The typical LTS support in Linux distributions are 5 years, but some have longer support available. With Ubuntu you can get additional 7 years by using the free for Home users "Ubuntu Pro" subscription. Which brings it to 12 years. Professionals have to pay a little bit (its not expensive) to get that support. For anyone who really considers using the same distribution for 10 years, they should consider Ubuntu Pro.
A particular version of Linux Mint, the example you mentioned, is supported for 4 years, whereas Windows 10 was supported for 10 years.
True, but often the distributions have an upgrade plan (for free). In example you can install an Ubuntu LTS and upgrade 4 years later to the next major LTS release. However, sometimes this has problems, because so much time and changes are in between. This is for sure.
There are distributions with longer support period. Debian comes to my mind. But I don't know how long and there were 10 year supported distributions too.
Your PC will turn on. But you won't get security updates (meaning more and more dangerous to surf the web). Some software stop working too, because they stop supporting Windows 10. I think Steam will not work on it anymore, correct me if I am wrong. It will get worse over time, not right away on day one.
Congratz. I see, EndeavourOS, a man of culture as well. :D But how did you came to OpenMandriva? It's not a usual distribution newcomers choose. Not because its hard to use, but because its a bit less popular. What made you chose this, just curious, not saying its bad or anything like that. I'm curious for the reason.
If you don't care the entire operating system, just to run a few specific software, then there are gotta be better alternatives. Debian, Mint or even Fedora could be good alternatives.
Exactly what I wanted to say. If you have to modify the operating system this much, why do you want use it? It's not like Windows, we have lot of alternatives, and similar alternatives using the same foundation too. I don't understand these efforts.
Why would anyone on Linux want to use a Microsoft terminal editor, when especially on Linux we have a long history of very strong and good terminal editors? I mean really, why?
Only sunshine and roses allowed? For all the Ai hype in the media and lot of people blindly following, its good to see and remind us the shortcomings. As long as it is done properly and honest, I have nothing against a "Pro" and a "Contra" article.
As an Open Source and Linux fan, this is a little bit sour news. I don't know how this impacts real world. For anyone who does cross compile Windows apps from Linux, does this affect in any way? Article says it won't. So Tier 2 only means how much of bug testing and development is devoted to it, right?
Netscape asked Brendan Eich to develop a scripting language that looks like Java, but be object oriented rather than class based.
I don't understand this part. Isn't object oriented also class based?? I mean that's the entire reason why classes exist, to create objects. Isn't it? How is this separated here?
I'm a huuuge fan of RetroArch and have setup over 80 cores :D. I only use standalone emulators for cores that are not available in RetroArch (such as Yuzu and RPCS3).
The article itself is a bit bare bones though. Here is the official installation documentation for Linux: https://docs.libretro.com/guides/install-gnu/ I personally have it installed through the official Archlinux package, but they are slow on updating it. Its more than a month now and they still are on an older version. Bleeding Edge? Who says that! It's the reason why I think to switch to the Flatpak version, maybe, maybe not.
When you install it through the official package in Archlinux, you have to change some paths in the settings where cores are saved. That way you can use the RetroArch internal update, so it can download and install cores in the directory you want. Because if you install RetroArch from official package, its managed and installed in a directory the normal user have no access without sudo. I changed the cores path to "~/.config/retroarch/cores". Note, Flatpak has its own file structure and paths, so do not do this with that.
There is also an official RetroArch version for Steam. I use that on my Steam Deck. The good thing is, its always up to date on day one release of RetroArch. And it has Cloud Save support for save files of games. Negative is, that not all cores are supported. However you can install them manually in the cores directory, but then you have to update it manually too if you do that. I also have my own custom controls and menus for RetroArch on Steam Deck, but not uploaded it yet. Really really need to do this...
Last but not least, some shameless plug of a post I made about RetroArch Shaders: https://thingsiplay.game.blog/2024/10/19/showcase-for-retroarch-shaders-2024/