Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

theunknownmuncher

@ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
603
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Encrypting without full disk encryption question

    Jump

  • If it can power up and decrypt the docker volumes on its own without prompting you for a password in your basement, it will also power up and decrypt the docker volumes on its own without prompting the robbers for a password in their basement

  • Google is intentionally throttling YouTube videos, slowing down users with ad blockers

    Jump

  • I'll wait.

  • What do you even do at a gym?

    Jump

  • Run on a treadmill and lift some weights?

    Yes, that is exactly what you do at a gym.

    I feel like I could do all of that at home. Gym memberships are insanely expensive.

    Absolutely correct.

    Are home workouts actually effective?

    Yes.

    Does one even enjoy gym time?

    Yes.

  • Wallet – The Jenkins

    Jump

  • If I cared what ChatGPT says, I would ask it.

  • Wikipedia Pauses AI-Generated Summaries After Editor Backlash

    Jump

  • the Top section of each wikipedia article is already a summary of the article

  • Perfect date

    Jump

  • It's the only way that makes sense

  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Jump

  • Yes, and the post title is just the title of the article 🤦

  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Jump

  • You never clicked on the link, did you?

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • loses the argument "we’re at the age-old internet stalemate!" LMAO

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Yes, but not just plants

  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Jump

  • American exceptionalism definitely sucks, but this is not an example of American exceptionalism. The source is an article from an American magazine, published for an American audience.

  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Jump

  • Yeah I mean the tax payers have literally already paid for all of both SpaceX and Starlink. The public paid for it, the public should own it.

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • There is a distinction between data and an action you perform on data (matrix maths, codec algorithm, etc.). It’s literally completely different.

    Incorrect. You might want to take an information theory class before speaking on subjects like this.

    I literally cannot be wrong that LLMs cannot think or reason, there’s no room for debate, it’s settled long ago.

    Lmao yup totally, it's not like this type of research currently gets huge funding at universities and institutions or anything like that 😂 it's a dead research field because it's already "settled". (You're wrong 🤭)

    LLMs are just tools not sentient or verging on sentient

    Correct. No one claimed they are "sentient" (you actually mean "sapient", not "sentient", but it's fine because people commonly mix these terms up. Sentience is about the physical senses. If you can respond to stimuli from your environment, you're sentient, if you can "I think, therefore I am", you're sapient). And no, LLMs are not sapient either, and sapience has nothing to do with neural networks' ability to mathematically reason or use logic, you're just moving the goalpost. But at least you moved it far enough to be actually correct?

  • Even Fox News isn’t impressed with Musk dodging question over alleged drug use

    Jump

  • Even I'm not impressed by Elon Musk's PR team pushing a narrative of him being a victim of drug addiction in order to shift responsibility for his actions and also give him an opportunity to repair his public image by getting clean.

    ^ the real headline. There isn't an amount of ketamine you can take to make you do a sieg heil on stage

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • LOL you didn't really make the point you thought you did. It isn't an "improper comparison" (it's called a false equivalency FYI), because there isn't a real distinction between information and this thing you just made up called "basic action on data", but anyway have it your way:

    Your comment is still exactly like saying an audio pipeline isn't really playing music because it's actually just doing basic math.

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • To write the second line, the model had to satisfy two constraints at the same time: the need to rhyme (with "grab it"), and the need to make sense (why did he grab the carrot?). Our guess was that Claude was writing word-by-word without much forethought until the end of the line, where it would make sure to pick a word that rhymes. We therefore expected to see a circuit with parallel paths, one for ensuring the final word made sense, and one for ensuring it rhymes.

    Instead, we found that Claude plans ahead. Before starting the second line, it began "thinking" of potential on-topic words that would rhyme with "grab it". Then, with these plans in mind, it writes a line to end with the planned word.

    🙃 actually read the research?

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • Yes, neural networks can be implemented with matrix operations. What does that have to do with proving or disproving the ability to reason? You didn't post a relevant or complete thought

    Your comment is like saying an audio file isn't really music because it's just a series of numbers.

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • You're confusing the confirmation that the LLM cannot explain it's under-the-hood reasoning as text output, with a confirmation of not being able to reason at all. Anthropic is not claiming that it cannot reason. They actually find that it performs complex logic and behavior like planning ahead.

  • I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally

    Jump

  • I don't want to brigade, so I'll put my thoughts here. The linked comment is making the same mistake about self preservation that people make when they ask an LLM to "show it's work" or explain it's reasoning. The text response of an LLM cannot be taken at it's word or used to confirm that kind of theory. It requires tracing the logic under the hood.

    Just like how it's not actually an AI assistant, but trained and prompted to output text that is expected to be what an AI assistant would respond with, if it is expected that it would pursue self preservation, then it will output text that matches that. It's output is always "fake"

    That doesn't mean there isn't a real potential element of self preservation, though, but you'd need to dig and trace through the network to show it, not use the text output.