Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

theunknownmuncher

@ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
603
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • OpenAI just launched its new ChatGPT Agent that can make as many as 1 complicated cupcake order per hour, but even Sam Altman says you probably shouldn't trust it for 'high-stakes uses'

    Jump

  • It's telling that you're focused on personal assumptions instead of addressing the argument

  • OpenAI just launched its new ChatGPT Agent that can make as many as 1 complicated cupcake order per hour, but even Sam Altman says you probably shouldn't trust it for 'high-stakes uses'

    Jump

  • No you can't if you don't know the libraries

    IDE.

    Python is entirely dependent on what libraries you include

    ??

    If you don't know what you need you can't do shit.

    IDE.

    The problems you propose in your comment are not only greatly exaggerated but already been solved for decades using conventional tools AND apply to literally all languages, having nothing at all to do with python. Good try! My statement holds true.

    Maybe your assumption is that you're in a cave writing code in pencil on paper, but that's not a typical working condition. If you have access to Claude to use as a crutch, then you have access to search for an available python library and read some "Getting Started" paragraphs.

    Seriously, if the only real value that AI provides is "you don't need to know the libraries you're using" 💀 that's not quite as strong of an argument as you think it is lmaooo "knowing the libraries" isn't exactly an existing challenge or software engineering problem that people struggle with...

  • OpenAI just launched its new ChatGPT Agent that can make as many as 1 complicated cupcake order per hour, but even Sam Altman says you probably shouldn't trust it for 'high-stakes uses'

    Jump

  • Anyone who already knows another programming language but has never used python in their life can write a simple python app quickly, regardless

  • OpenAI just launched its new ChatGPT Agent that can make as many as 1 complicated cupcake order per hour, but even Sam Altman says you probably shouldn't trust it for 'high-stakes uses'

    Jump

  • Kagi is all in on AI. Its the AI slop version of a search ranking algorithm

  • What's the largest object one can buy for the least amount of money?

    Jump

  • A chair is less to deal with than a room full of balls

  • Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump.

    Jump

  • Trump supporter is done

    Jump

  • Andrew Cuomo says he’ll run a third-party bid for New York mayor after losing Democratic primary

    Jump

  • "Vote blue no matter who" for me but not for thee

  • Removed

    Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

    Jump

  • Again, for the third time, that was not really the point either and I'm not interested in dancing around a technical scope defining censorship in this field, at least in this discourse right here and now. It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.

    ...

    Either way, my point is that you are using wishy-washy, ambiguous, catch-all terms such as "censorship" that make your writings here not technically correct, either. What is censorship, in an informatics context? What does that mean? How can it be applied to sets of data? That's not a concretely defined term if you're wanting to take the discourse to the level that it seems you are, like it or not.

    Lol this you?

  • Removed

    Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

    Jump

  • if you want to define censorship in this context that way, you're more than welcome to, but it is a non-standard definition that I am not really sold on the efficacy of. I certainly won't be using it going forwards.

    Lol you've got to be trolling.

    https://arxiv.org/html/2504.03803v1

    I just felt the need to clarify to anyone reading that Willison isn't a nobody

    I didn't say he's a nobody. What was that about a "respectable degree of chartiable interpretation of others"? Seems like you're the one putting words in mouths, here.

    If he was writing about django, I'd defer to his expertise.

  • Removed

    Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

    Jump

  • Willison has never claimed to be an expert in the field of machine learning, but you should give more credence to his opinions.

    Yeah, I would if he didn't demonstrate such blatant misconceptions.

    Willison is a prominent figure in the web-development scene

    🤦 "They know how to sail a boat so they know how a car engine works"

    Willison never claims or implies this in his article, you just kind of stuff those words in his mouth.

    Reading comprehension. I never implied that he says anything about censorship. It is a correct and valid example that shows how his understanding is wrong about how system prompts work. "Define censorship" is not the argument you think it is lol. Okay though, I'll define the "censorship" I'm talking about as refusal behavior that is introduced during RLHF and DPO alignment, and no the system prompt will not change this behavior.

    EDIT: saw your edit about him publishing tools that make using an LLM easier. Yeahhhh lol writing python libraries to interface with LLM APIs is not LLM expertise, that's still just using LLMs but programatically. See analogy about being a mechanic vs a good driver.

  • Removed

    Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

    Jump

  • Is my comment wrong though? Another possibility is that Grok is given an example of searching for Elon Musk's tweets when it is presented with the available tool calls. Just because it outputs the system prompt when asked does not mean that we are seeing the full context, or even the real system prompt.

    Posting blog guides on how to code with ChatGPT is not expertise on LLMs. It's like thinking someone is an expert mechanic because they can drive a car well.

  • Removed

    Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

    Jump

  • If the system prompt doesn’t tell it to search for Elon’s views, why is it doing that?

    My best guess is that Grok “knows” that it is “Grok 4 buit by xAI”, and it knows that Elon Musk owns xAI, so in circumstances where it’s asked for an opinion the reasoning process often decides to see what Elon thinks.

    Yeah, this blogger shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how LLMs work or how system prompts work. LLM behavior is not directly controlled by the system prompt the way this person imagines. For example, censorship that is present in the training set will be "baked in" to the model and the system prompt will not affect it, no matter how the LLM is told not to be censored in that way.

    My best guess is that the LLM is interfacing with a tool in order to search through tweets, and the training set that demonstrates how to use the tool contains example searches for Elon Musk's tweets.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Is a CPU bottleneck really that bad?

    Jump

  • I already did my research beforehand and confirmed that 3080 is indeed good value and suitable for my needs.

    But... its literally not in any way...

  • Is a CPU bottleneck really that bad?

    Jump

  • Ok, dunno why you're asking for help when you already know better lol. I tried to help you

  • Is a CPU bottleneck really that bad?

    Jump

  • You sound set on buying the 3080, which is totally fine I guess. It's not like it won't render 1080p games with great performance.

    You're just going to be overpaying for an obsolete GPU that you won't actually be able to utilize fully, and will be bottlenecked on VRAM before games can actually push it fully. Meanwhile there are newer GPUs that will also render 1080p games with the same performance for less money. The 3080 has already aged out and has no future proof value so you'll just end up replacing it soon. So its just a really poor choice and poor value to buy one in 2025.

    It had enough VRAM at the time and now is even considered one of the best NVidia GPUs ever made by some people

    It's wild how wrong you are. The 3080 was widely received as a total flop and NVIDIA was heavily criticized for it because it was obvious they purposely put too little VRAM to encourage more sales of the 3090... It is the worst X080 series GPU NVIDIA has released and only had marginal performance uplift over the 2080.

    EDIT: lol you can downvote me but it doesn't make me wrong

  • Think Democrats and Republicans can't work together? On sealing eviction records, they do.

    Jump

  • They work together every single day to prevent solidarity from forming among the working class