Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
1
Comments
933
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Never!

    Jump
  • Yeah, I use it for personal link sharing for Immich. Sharing photos is a breeze.

  • He falsely said Trump wasn't entirely above the law.

  • I'm thinking of that scene from Dr. Doolittle with Eddie Murphy where the lady keeps going to the hospital with an allergic reaction to shellfish. Later, she's in a bathroom stall gnawing on a lobster while her face swells up.

    I never understood that, but then my doctor told me to cut out sugar or my pancreas might explode (or something) and I immediately thought of that character.

  • I'm not going around in circles with you. There are 435 congressional reps in the house, plus 33 senate races. Examples are provided in the article.

    You're not interested in a good faith discussion, so I'm going to ignore you from here on. Maybe someone else can help you.

  • How many examples would you like? Do you have a specific interest in your local politics? We can find your district and evaluate the local candidates in your upcoming elections, if you like.

  • The UN doesn't control the teleprompter. Trump's team controlled the teleprompter. If someone else had access to it, they could fuck with the speeches and change words and shit. Under normal circumstances, the speech given by the president to the UN would need to be very carefully worded to avoid international incidents. Trump is a walking international catastrophe, so that's a silly accusation regardless.

  • I don't have a comprehensive list, but several are mentioned in the article.

  • It really depends on what sort of knight we're talking about. Despite how they are portrayed in movies, swords were more for ceremony than for fighting, and could have been anything from a dagger to a saber to a broadsword. Full plate armor is designed for mounted combat, and most duels were won by whoever knocked the other guy down first.

    One good swing could kill a lion, I'm sure, but if you miss, or it doesn't kill the lion, then the lion will pounce and knock down the knight. Even lightweight armor would be 30-60 lbs, and once you're down, the lion has won.

  • So here's the thing, I have never hunted a lion, so I really am just speculating. I know that individual humans have hunted and killed lions, and theoretically a single human could do it. I don't think that, even with 10 hunters, the humans are guaranteed to come out unscathed. Modern hunters with rifles and jeeps and tranquilized lions still get mauled to death on occasion, so like I said, any given sunday.

  • Humans have successfully hunted and killed lions, and lions can definitely kill a human.

    I think it depends on the arena. Believe it or not, I think the human has better chances in the wild. Human endurance is our superpower, and you could keep scaring the lion with loud armor noises until it collapsed from exhaustion.

    In a cage match, I think the lion wins. A knight's sword in any era is not designed for hunting. If the knight was using a lance or a pike, that would be a better choice, but I think maneuverability is the biggest liability for the knight. Mail armor would deflect scratches, and full plate armor might prevent bites to the covered areas, but once the lion has the knight on the ground, it wouldn't matter how much protection he has. Proximity benefits the lion, and there's no question who is faster and stronger.

    Still, humans have killed lions without any armor, so it's any given sunday and all that.

    Edit to add a dramatic reenactment of such a battle.

  • Alternative headline, existing dnc leadership is really bad, and progressive voters are running their own candidates.

  • Used to be treason was a capital offense. Now, you just need to gargle the shriveled testicles of a psychotic octogenarian.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Because that'snot what the graph claims, and it is definitely not what the graph implies.

    The graph says that there has been a 400% increase in the prevalence of autism. That's not true, and is unsupported by the evidence. There has been a marked increase in the effective diagnosis and therapeutic interventions, but autism was largely undiagnosed and under-reported for almost all of human history. We're still improving and refining the diagnostic criteria, and any changes in the number of cases should not be suggested to support any causal relationship with anything.

    The graph is a lie, intended to push a political narrative that undermines the credibility of actual science, all in a transparent effort to distract from powerful child rapists raping children.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The organization run by a brain worm driving a human suit?

  • And yet, when Massie goes to vote, he remembers who has their thumb up his bum.

  • Yep, and their belief is a danger to literally everyone who does or will ever live on Earth.

  • Not at all. And in fact, I wish more people weren't expecting a cool prize at the end of all the death and destruction.

  • To be entirely fair, we are like 2 cubic meters of carbon dioxide away from total ecological collapse. Made-made climate change is now beyond any threshold where we previously had reasonable expectations of being able to prevent it. The oceans will rise, climate catastrophes will increase, and the world will become more hostile.

    It kind of feels like were frogs in a boiling pot, and we're living though the apocalypse now. But the wifi still works, so scroll on and don't think about it too much.

  • I just find it absurd that the story goes "The White House wasn't informed of what Trump told Tulsi to do." Like certainly, she and Trump both work for Putin, and revoking the credentials from anyone who investigated Russian interference in the election is transparent corruption.