Skip Navigation

Don't forget to stay hydrated.🍉🍉🍉🍉🍉

@ testaccount789 @sh.itjust.works

Posts
4
Comments
94
Joined
3 yr. ago

This is a test account for testing out lemmy.

Bio update test: 2024-03-13

  • So far there's only cams, no?

  • This isn't necessarily about games.My mini PC only has 4GB of RAM because I thought I'd just buy it later, and "for now" if it just boots it's fine.

  • Wait, what happened? I thought SpaceX was about, well, space hardware.

  • I think Trump's imagining himself like this:

  • Those probably destroy things in rage at more occasions than just games.

  • But they are in the EU.

  • he demanded $7,500 for an interview

    Is he going to ask the police to pay him for interrogation?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That's because rock stations are busy playing Imagine Dragons.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I thought about trying this, but thinking about how to execute it already sounds painful enough.For input data, I could use my existing library of mostly individually-selected songs, currently at size 1,662. Since I mostly listen to everything, this spans a rather large range of dates.Then start taking random songs, and rating them on 1 - 10 scale in relation to entire library, enter ratings into 10 year buckets, and use mean of those ratings.Probably 5 ratings per bucket to keep it short.Unfortunately, I most likely can't fill every bucket, hell, some would remain empty. After all, classical music makes my library likely start in late 1600s, and end in 2025.I didn't think about that. Perhaps I could leave it out, and start at, say 1920s, but that would make the data incomplete.

    Problem is, I don't have the years for most of them, so that would mean looking up release dates for those individually.

    Huh, what if everyone would absolutely love (old) classical music, but we don't see a spike as the graph starts at age of -40?

  • We need fewer roads.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Hello?

  • I guess that would work for PB, but jelly is going to leave you with sticky fingers.

  • Depends on which fingers you want to get dirty.

  • I think it was a joke: reality. The source is reality (around us).

  • I tested it, it works as it is.

     c
        
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdbool.h>
    
    void main(){
            bool true_or_false = true;
            if(true_or_false){
                    goto if_true;
            }
            printf("This code runs only if false.\n");
            goto end_false_if;
    if_true:
            printf("This code runs only if true.\n");
    end_false_if:
            printf("This code always runs.\n");
    }
    
      

    If true, it jumps to if_true, then runs other code. If false, the if gets skipped, if false code gets run, then it skips over if true code.

  • UUUuuuuuh, I am not a programmer (you're going to say "thank god"), but...

    I sometimes even chain them. You can put yet another ternary operator in the else and keep going. You know, else-if.So anyway, I can get ternary operators spanning 2 - 3 lines.Oh, I also often have issues thinking of proper loops, so you'd see a few terribly used goto statements.

    Although I do remove ones that are obvious brain fart.For example, quite obvious

     c
        
    void example(bool true_or_false){
        if(true_or_false){
            //code if true
        }
        else{
            //code if false
        }
        //other code
    }
    
      

    Well, I've already had my brain goof up even that once or twice. "How the fuck", you're asking?

     c
        
    void example(bool true_or_false){
        if(true_or_false){
            goto if_true;
        }
        //code if false
        goto end_false_if;
    if_true:
        //code if true
    end_false_if:
        //other code
    }
    
      

    The brain-fart if-else.

  • Hams:"73!"

  • Where does it come from?