Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

technocrit

@ technocrit @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
521
Comments
2580
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • The difference between reasoning models and normal models is reasoning models are two steps,

    That's a garbage definition of "reasoning". Someone who is not a grifter would simply call them two-step models (or similar), instead of promoting misleading anthropomorphic terminology.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • The funny thing about this "AI" griftosphere is how grifters will make some outlandish claim and then different grifters will "disprove" it. Plenty of grant/VC money for everybody.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • Cars are horses. How do you feel about statement?

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • It's just the internet plus some weighted dice. Nothing to be afraid of.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • Sure, these grifters are shady AF about their wacky definition of "reason"... But that's just a continuation of the entire "AI" grift.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • This would be a much better paper if it addressed that question in an honest way.

    Instead they just parrot the misleading terminology that they're supposedly debunking.

    How dat collegial boys club undermines science...

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • There's probably alot of misunderstanding because these grifters intentionally use misleading language: AI, reasoning, etc.

    If they stuck to scientifically descriptive terms, it would be much more clear and much less sensational.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • Yeah I often think about this Rick N Morty cartoon. Grifters are like, "We made an AI ankle!!!" And I'm like, "That's not actually something that people with busted ankles want. They just want to walk. No need for a sentient ankle." It's a real gross distortion of science how everything needs to be "AI" nowadays.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • It's hard to to be heard when you're buried under all that sweet VC/grant money.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • Peak pseudo-science. The burden of evidence is on the grifters who claim "reason". But neither side has any objective definition of what "reason" means. It's pseudo-science against pseudo-science in a fierce battle.

  • Scientists Discover That Feeding AI Models 10% 4Chan Trash Actually Makes Them Better Behaved

    Jump

  • Just because something makes sense intuitively to one person, that doesn't mean it makes sense scientifically.

    They're probably not testing anything further because they can't even define their terms.

  • Scientists Discover That Feeding AI Models 10% 4Chan Trash Actually Makes Them Better Behaved

    Jump

  • bad data

    Can you define this? The authors/grifters call it "toxic data" but never define that either.

  • Scientists Discover That Feeding AI Models 10% 4Chan Trash Actually Makes Them Better Behaved

    Jump

  • Yes, it's interesting how grifters constantly pump out these phony results based on pseudo-science.

  • Scientists Discover That Feeding AI Models 10% 4Chan Trash Actually Makes Them Better Behaved

    Jump

  • Fresh "AI" pseudo-science for a monday morning.

    These grifters never even define "bad/toxic data". It's just 4chan ffs.

  • Is it possible to see if an article has already been posted?

    Jump

  • I haven't seen this in my browser. I think I'm using the default at lemmy.dbzer0.com.

  • Is it possible to see if an article has already been posted?

    Jump

  • Oh yeah thanks. I was kinda thinking that. I should have tried before posting. Hopefully it helps another person.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • I don't think that person cares about women or anything else. They just said that they don't even want to hear about it.

  • Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.

    Jump

  • ... And so we should call machines "intelligent"? That's not how science works.