We have four sets of fine china in our basement, from various grandparents passing. We also got one for our wedding. One day I'm going to pass them all to my kids.
I'm hoping that one day society collapses under the burden of guilt ridden plates.
Sure, but borderless doesn't mean lawless. I'm a world with no borders you'd have no immigration. But you'd still have laws applied when people are born, which is effectively the same thing. Giving them an ID. Making sure they're getting their education and vaccines. Etc.
And if you somehow avoided doing those things, that's breaking the law and you'd be illegally outside the system.
I could see this working in a world where people were sensible. I'd certainly support giving back some portion of the country and saying "ok you're your own country now, have at it".
Where people will fight to the death is: which parts and how much land.
But this at least is could be the framework for a reasonable option.
Yeah. I don't agree with that. I think it's quite reasonable that the country that now exists can have laws governing intake of people.
What other options are there?
I get the vibe. But give me one reasonable alternative.
Edit: I see nine down votes, one insult, and one option that only is reasonable if the resulting country would rely on the US for defense. Which is to say, there's no reasonable option behind this cool catch phrase. It's just a cool catch phrase. And I get down voting because I'm insulting. Your cool catchphrase. But we're not going to get anywhere if we're working off vibes.
I've found it useful when I want to turn a well defined rest API definition document into a bunch of POJO. I have it churn out boilerplate crap with no logic. Saves ten minutes here and there.
It's in favor of the thing that's killing the environment, putting people out of work, funneling money to the billionaires, inflating the stock market, and doing all of that recklessly.
Both :-)
The original art colors hurt my brain.