Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

lad

@ sukhmel @programming.dev

Posts
0
Comments
656
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages

    Jump

  • Or earlier, possibly

  • 40-year-old hacker group prefers Rust

    Jump

  • Sounds great, but as far as I know Diffie–Hellman doesn't protect from MitM attack if there's no trusted party to prove the integrity of keys sent. I skimmed through the description but this seems not to touch on that theme. Maybe it's sharing public keys in person time again.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • This is actually a confirmed meme though.

    Except for a couple of details from the link you posted: there were only two worms, and they are likely of the same age (don't think this can be determined more specifically than 'around 40 thousand years'), and the picture is absolutely wrong.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • because words are spelt as phonetically

    And consistently /s

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I thought the joke was that monologue should not include a second actor. But maybe it was about spelling ¯(ツ)/¯

  • There doesn't appear to be a limit to the maximum size the KDE cursor can get when you shake it.

    Jump

  • MacOS does this, but on screen recording it never shows it. Feels good to see Linux records what user actually saw

  • This software does not exist

    Jump

  • Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination

  • This software does not exist

    Jump

  • The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • I meant 'make sense' to mean 'could rewrite without garbage'. Maybe I was wrong, anyway

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • I'm afraid, LLMs are gone a bit further from the state when such 'poisoning' made sense.

    I'm afraid that soon this may reach a point where it will be easier for LLM to make sense of the text, than for a human, if this idea gets further development.

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • but what else could be representative /s

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • once the tool no longer works, you

    … try every trick to make it look like it works, blame everyone for not using it, blame everything for not working the way it should, break some things that are made with other tools that work for a good measure (it was their fault for being too arrogant, anyway)

  • You’re not as loosely coupled as you think!

    Jump

  • Reminds me of one site that said I shouldn't use 'git secret' because reasons. I've spent quite some time to find what do they propose to use instead (that wasn't as straightforward as in this article), turns out they provide a 'solution' that includes their partners' system to manage secrets. Another bullshit, in other words

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • You got me, I decided to read the article later (I hope to, at least). But your summary looks about right, I don't really expect C++ to become much safer than it is now, which is not very much. Should take a look at profiles, I love a good laugh

    Edit: looked up those ``profiles'', it looks like a vague and complicated proposal that will require an unrealistic amount of undertaking. But that might be seen as being in the spirit of C++

  • On "Safe" C++

    Jump

  • Later: short summary of the conclusion of what the committee does (read 307 minutes)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • So, GorrillaX?

  • I made a FOSS AI file organizer!

    Jump

  • This is almost what I need for my ancient meme folder

  • Asking the real questions

    Jump

  • Reasonable and viable ≠ RFC compliant

    This quote summarises my views:

    There is some danger that common usage and widespread sloppy coding will establish a de facto standard for e-mail addresses that is more restrictive than the recorded formal standard.

  • The Truth

    Jump

  • Don't worry, this idea is likely too complicated