Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
2
Comments
152
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • But please, do go on and tell me how these last 8 years of pressure on the Democratic party are equal to [the abolition of slavery]

    That comparison is all you huffing your own fumes. But if you want a civil war comparison here it is: You're a dough faced democrat who thinks the planter class can be reasoned with.

    If you're an american and you're calling yourself a socialist you should at least familiarize yourself with Marx and his perspective on the US Civil War, which he wrote extensively about.

  • You clearly haven't been paying attention during those eight years if you're spouting that glassy eyed naïveté. You can try reading the article to get a perspective of what the democratic establishment thinks of "socialist and progressive movement" co-opting the democratic party. Such a movement will only succeed over their dead bodies (politically speaking).

  • We need a socialist and progressive movement to co-opt the Democratic party

    People have been trying that for the past 8 years if you haven't been paying attention.

  • The reason for Boeing's recent failures are actually well known: They purchased McDonnel Douglass and became defense contractors.

    When they did that all of the McDonnel Douglass execs they acquired were able climb up the ranks of Boeing because they had political connections to get those DoD contracts. The story is the Boeing corporation acquired McDD but McDD execs acquired Boeing.

    What happened next is Boeing started doing normal DoD contractor practices and outsource as much as possible to cut costs and open new non-union shops. The clusterfuck that is Boeing now is the outcome of that process.

    Obviously you can still call this "c-suite greed" but that would be missing some important details.

  • There's literally two astronauts stuck in space right now. They've been stuck there for months because Boeing's shit keeps breaking.

    Not billionaires though.

  • Its because they get pushback from swifties. Its the conflict they are seeking not advancing any political goal.

  • There's vastly worse billionaires than Taylor Swift. Idk what Swifties on Lemmy you're trying to trigger. Thompson wasn't even billionaire but I'd say he was worse than Swift.

  • If they catch him they will kill him.

  • The M4A movement was absolutely incompetent if you compared it to health insurance Super PACs. It was basically a bunch unpaid volunteers, many with their own medical debt, against fully salaried lobby groups paid for with our premiums, our denied claims.

  • I think it would be the other way around: the doctors don't stop giving you anesthesia if the surgry goes long, but now you wake up to it costing some extra thousands of dollars.

  • Its Afraid.

  • Do both but only publish the C tutorial. Only do a Rust translation as a draft so you can learn Rust. It would be wildly irresponsible to publish the Rust translation when its the first time you've written Rust.

  • ansible-playbook even if its just one target host. Services might get hosted as systemd or docker, or a raw binary, whatever's appropriate. The absible docker module is extremely similar to docker-compose. It only gets messy if you have a complicated system of networks and dependencies.

  • You continue to not cite anything but your own baseless speculation and now you're blatantly misquoting me in bad faith.

    • That might be illegal because it was confidential.
    • That wouldn’t violate any laws, even if it did effect negotiations

    Fuck off.

  • Because your explanation didn't demonstrate why that matters. Any candidate's position can jeopardize ongoing negotiations if its contrary to the current admin.

    The VP is very much at liberty to sabotage the current admin. There's illegal ways to do it sure. Like if Harris said "Bibi openly admitted on a confidential line that he's doing genocide." That might be illegal because it was confidential. But she could say "I think Bibi is doing genocide. Biden doesn't, but I think he's wrong". That wouldn't violate any laws, even if it did effect negotiations. Remember the VP is an elected position, not a cabinet member. The president can't fire them.

    If you're just speculating then its baseless speculation. You might be right, but you'll have to point to an actual law to prove your point.

  • By that logic any presidential candidate would be banned from disagreeing with the president on active foreign policy issues which is absolutely not true. There's no legal reason why the VP can't disagree with the president.

  • Are you suggesting that its illegal for the VP to publicly disagree with the President?

  • I don't know why anyone thought Harris would change course on Israel beyond mere wishful thinking. She made it abundantly clear numerous times that she was going to stay the course.

  • If you're a politician who doesn't appeal to your base then democracy is not for you. That's just how democracy works.