I would want it public too so I could appeal to it simply being absurd.
the public has demonstrated time and time again that they cannot accept that people in power can ever do anything wrong.
not only that we simply do not have what is in those documents it might seem absurd to us if we haven't seen it the true horrors that we already know for a fact are in those documents.
Also we know the vast majority of the files have not been released yet and they are protecting powerful people (poorly) she is a powerful person we do not have the information on her we need to judge her.
This could all be a political stunt to make her look bad (I don't think so she doesn't seem all that appalled with Bill she at the very least knows) but we won't get to the bottom of it until both Republicans and Democrats are out and a third party who is not beholden to Epstein and his cohorts are all out, so don't blindly vote Democrat.
I think i I've never seen such a bull shit press conference as this, she is lying out hir teeth with every word trying to make it sound like a conspiracy by bringing up Pizza gate and UFO's.
My group without any possible room for disagreement from a sain man, disagrees with you the outsider.
My group (the royal 'We' giving a sense of universal acceptance but the sentence above clearly disagrees creating an in/out group mentality and the illusion that you are the odd one out, placing me in the out group) without any possible room for disagreement from a sain man, disagrees with you the outsider (this last bit is interesting because it is not a sentence The layman would agree with, wether true or not, ergo the entire point was to place me as an outsider not to make a fact).
That is an adversarial comment looking to discredit me.
A more proper way to say that would be something like:
You could domesticate a velociraptor.
Or if you truly believe it to be so
We do actually have evidence that it is possible to domesticate velociraptors.
As far as it being an opinion you are technically correct, your intentions might not have been to communicate aggression, however your opinion in this case doesn't fall in the equation. you are performing the act of communication, the information that I received is what matters, otherwise you have failed that goal.
The word "absolutely" is generally considered an absolute and since it is in the first sentence sets the tone for the rest of the conversation as someone who absolutely has no room for negotiation on his view.
B: even if dinosaurs have been around since the beginning of humanity we couldn't have domesticated them yet and possibly never could.
C: Dogs are mammals we are practically the same species compared to dinosaurs.
D: velociraptors specifically did not have social and hierarchical genes that would require evolution to take over not domestication it took humans ~200,000,000 years to evolve that good luck keeping humans alive that long.
You don't understand! A trolley was headed for a blind deaf man who was incapable of feeling pain, we could let him die and he wouldn't notice or we could pull the lever and it would hit the safe destroying the bullying reports the victim of the bully would not know he got away with it because he's moved to a school in Canada and the bully has already learned his lesson so a net good would technically come from the outcome.
Trust me I actually argued we should let blind man die because there's no victims and you get a net good from the other side, my colleague was the one who argued the life had intrinsic value.
In the end we couldn't agree so we flipped a coin.
The chemicals could easily be mixed in with the fuel All it would require is a doped fule source maby a couple chemists and a few laborers and the couple of oil oligarchs / governments who did it, the world is flooded with bad chemicals they could have came from the plains and nobody would know the difference.
Who's to say it doesn't help the fuel? Lead did in leaded gasoline, there's a cover up that was real, far bigger and more deadly than chemtrails.
Once again, I don't believe it but it's not crazy.
How many data points you think that is something like 5,177? HAY chatGPT HOW MANY NUKES DOSE AMERICA HAVE?
...
What a wonderful coincidence.