but it was not a centrist message. It was a far right message that included blaming immigrants for job losses and promoting isolationist trade policies.
JFC Trump did both. I said this at the start.
First. He did the centrist message. Jobs, wages, inflation. Ok? Those are the messages that the center voted for Trump on.
Ok second. This is second. Separate from the first point. Second: He did a thinly veiled dog whistle to blame immigrants for everything. And everything I already said: yes it's so overt that it's not even a dog whistle anymore. And I already yes certain center voters should have seen through it. And that we on Lemmy can generally see through that, but apparently many people can't. Like I said it all already.
So. What won Trump the election? What part pushed him over the edge to win? I'm saying it was the center voter. The center voter that voted for Trump because Trump appealed to the center voter on issues like jobs, inflation, manufacturing, etc. Those are the issues that the center cares about. And Trump appealed to them more on those issues than Harris appealed to them. JFC. How many times do I have to say the same thing.
Small business? Sounds good in theory but how many voters run a small business? Not enough. It has no appeal for the 99.9% of center voters that just work a standard job. You know what does appeal to the center voter? What Trump says about jobs, inflation, manufacturing. And we're right back to the start.
Again? Seriously? It does not need to be mutually exclusive. Do you know what I mean by that? Yes jobs, inflation, manufacturing, etc is not exclusively left, it's not exclusively center, and it's not exclusively right. WE AGREE ON THAT. JFC.
BUT those are the issues that won Trump the center voter. Those are the issues that convinced the center voter to vote for Trump. And that's how Trump won, by getting the center voter. By appealing to the center voter on jobs, inflation, manufacturing, etc. Trump did that better than Harris on the center voter. I'm trying all the different ways to say this and I'm just repeating myself.
See? You're still on your strawman, just in a different manner. You tried this before too.
You want to pigeonhole me into saying drop policy this or that so that you can complete your strawman to think that I personally want ___ platform. You're playing games.
No real discussion can ever be had with you while you insist on your "AND" operator. At least try to break it.
See I made a mistake. I should have left you pondering your "AND" operator of yours. You tried to duck and distract (to both me and yourself), which I responded to.
So I'll leave today to think about you breaking that "AND" operator that you insist on other people.
You mean the last 4 months they had in the last 44+ years? Which Obama used to get the ACA through. I barely blame him for that.
BUT that wasn't even the point, which you're ducking. You said take the left for granted and don't offer them anything. Well they literally didn't, and they literally offered them exactly what they wanted. And the left didn't show up.
You know you remind me of a conversation I had with someone else. I told him that I wanted environmental policy, but that environmental platforms didn't win elections. He couldn't comprehend separating those out. To him you had to think that environmental policy was good and think it won elections. Or if you said environmental policy didn't win elections, well to him that meant you personally didn't want environmental policies. He had to group those two together. He was literally unable to separate them out. Well that's exactly like you, just on different issues.
Every time they rely on the left they lose. Like we just saw that. They relied on the left coming out for abortion rights and to save mfing democracy and they couldn't even do that.
These aren't centrist issues, these are just...issues.
.... Which means they are issued that the center cares about.
Like, jobs isn't left, right, or center. It's just something that matters to people.
Seriously? You walked around the whole thing to (kinda) say they aren't center issues, just to return to say they are issues that appeal to the center. They don't need to be exclusively center issues. It just needs to win the center voter.
It's an issue that the center is glued to and that the center wants and that the center voted for. So yes, Trump appealed to the center. And he won because he got the center voter. Yes Trump also appealed to the far right via what really aren't even dog whistles anymore. But he also appealed up the center. And the center is how he won.
Like c'mon how many different ways do I have to put it to say that he appealed to the center, got the center voter, and won because of the center voters.
I used to think that, but really he won the center voter. He appealed on jobs, and inflation, and manufacturing, and all those things that are center. He really did get the center voter.
We can bemoan that people should be smarter to see through the BS (and I think most people on lemmy can see through it), but people aren't and Trump won the center voter.
Trump did a better job appealing to the center than Harris did. Harris relied on the left showing up for abortion rights and for democracy, and they didn't show up.
Trump has reportedly been gathering “battle plans” to attack drug cartels in Mexico since early 2023, with or without Mexico’s permission.
One source close to Trump told Rolling Stone about a plan for a “soft” invasion of the country, in which U.S. special forces would assassinate cartel leaders covertly
These actions vary in their level of force, including drone strikes and airstrikes against cartel targets such as drug labs, sending military advisers and trainers to Mexico, sending “kill teams” to the country, using cyberwarfare against drug lords and their organizations, and the assassination plan.
People voted for Nader in protest that the Dems were not progressive enough. And that's what got us Bush.
Gore is the environmentalist. If you think that Gore wouldn't have implemented environmental policy then frankly you are far gone. And reading the rest of your reply lines up with that, so I'm out. Yes it's congress, if you have all 3 then the president pushes for what they want to do, and common parlance is to talk about the president.
JFC Trump did both. I said this at the start.
First. He did the centrist message. Jobs, wages, inflation. Ok? Those are the messages that the center voted for Trump on.
Ok second. This is second. Separate from the first point. Second: He did a thinly veiled dog whistle to blame immigrants for everything. And everything I already said: yes it's so overt that it's not even a dog whistle anymore. And I already yes certain center voters should have seen through it. And that we on Lemmy can generally see through that, but apparently many people can't. Like I said it all already.
So. What won Trump the election? What part pushed him over the edge to win? I'm saying it was the center voter. The center voter that voted for Trump because Trump appealed to the center voter on issues like jobs, inflation, manufacturing, etc. Those are the issues that the center cares about. And Trump appealed to them more on those issues than Harris appealed to them. JFC. How many times do I have to say the same thing.
Small business? Sounds good in theory but how many voters run a small business? Not enough. It has no appeal for the 99.9% of center voters that just work a standard job. You know what does appeal to the center voter? What Trump says about jobs, inflation, manufacturing. And we're right back to the start.