I'm guessing the cheap, good quality, printers are cheap because they want to capture market share and enshitify (all the proprietary stuff they use is a hint).
I was looking for something to replace my old Creality CR10S a few months ago, Bambu and Qidi were tempting because of the price, but I didn't like how proprietary everything was. The Prusa Core One looked nice, but looks like they're going a little less "free" now with their Open Community License and locked boot loaders. I would have got a Troodon (Voron-derived pre-built printer), but they were out of stock. I settled on just getting a Formbot Voron kit. Took a very long time to build, but I'm very happy with it. I know the printer inside and out, so it's easy to debug, modify, or repair if I need to.
In my opinion, if you're already somewhat familiar with 3d printing, I'd build a Voron from a kit. If not, I'd get a Voron-derived pre-built like a Troodon or Sovol SV8 (I think the Sovol has a proprietary toolhead though). If you want an easy Apple-like experience, but still pretty "open," I'd get a Prusa.
If you think you're going to want to print higher-temp, warp-prone filaments like ABS/ASA/PA, I would not choose a bed-slinger (e.g. Mk4s), because they are harder to enclose nicely and take up a lot of space if enclosed. As one data-point, my core-xy Voron produces much higher quality prints (e.g. less artifacts) and is faster than my bedslinger CR10S.
AI companies offer HIPPA compliant services. They have zero data retention policies (supposedly).
It's possible to do some server side AI stuff with decent privacy guarantees. Apple utilizes homomorphic encryption to do stuff like landmark ID in photos, which is neat.
I've heard the excuse that they're private property so they can't. They're not hard to remove though. They're usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.
The trend I see are the Mac Minis with a lot of unified memory. These are typically very well off people though. Prices for even old GPUs like 3090s are ridiculous now. I don't think connecting 2 machines over Ethernet would work well, but putting 2 GPUs in a single machine does.
I thought enshitification was the specific process of "platforms" gaining a large market share, then exploiting both the buyers and sellers that use the platform to jack up profits/extract more rent.
Replace "sustainable," and the bit about profit and capitalism, with "efficient" and "corruption and un-free markets," then this is a common right-wing talking point (back when the right wing tried to engage intellectually, at least).
In my unscientific opinion, the current population is unsustainable, and there's no known ways to make it sustainable enough to support the population in the long term (I hope there will be, of course). The most sustainable framing practices are less intensive and result in less output per acre. That's just about survival, ignoring quality of life. I've heard it claimed we'd need 5 Earths for everyone on Earth to live a first-world-like lifestyle. Granted, we should drastically change our lifestyles.
Climate change will also likely lower the human population the Earth can support, and I think we will likely adopt even less sustainable practices to make up for the loss, accelerating our own demise; kicking and scratching and bringing all the ecosystems of the Earth down with us.
Some people are comparing this to the industrial revolution. Which resulted in hellish conditions for much of the working class for ~100 years until unionization started becoming more widespread.
I did most of this a long time ago when the team was 2-4 programmers. Moved to PRs when we started bringing on interns. No way the business owners would've allowed pair programming. Pair programming may be better and more productive, but the decision makers are often more ideological than rational.
They also want training data from their employees correcting the agents so the agents can eventually replace them (that's what they're hoping for at least).
When I did embedded programming that's what I did. Nothing was dynamically allocated. It also allowed me to write a debugger that would watch how variables changed by just directly reading from memory, chart them, and and stuff like that.
I'm guessing the cheap, good quality, printers are cheap because they want to capture market share and enshitify (all the proprietary stuff they use is a hint).
I was looking for something to replace my old Creality CR10S a few months ago, Bambu and Qidi were tempting because of the price, but I didn't like how proprietary everything was. The Prusa Core One looked nice, but looks like they're going a little less "free" now with their Open Community License and locked boot loaders. I would have got a Troodon (Voron-derived pre-built printer), but they were out of stock. I settled on just getting a Formbot Voron kit. Took a very long time to build, but I'm very happy with it. I know the printer inside and out, so it's easy to debug, modify, or repair if I need to.
In my opinion, if you're already somewhat familiar with 3d printing, I'd build a Voron from a kit. If not, I'd get a Voron-derived pre-built like a Troodon or Sovol SV8 (I think the Sovol has a proprietary toolhead though). If you want an easy Apple-like experience, but still pretty "open," I'd get a Prusa.
If you think you're going to want to print higher-temp, warp-prone filaments like ABS/ASA/PA, I would not choose a bed-slinger (e.g. Mk4s), because they are harder to enclose nicely and take up a lot of space if enclosed. As one data-point, my core-xy Voron produces much higher quality prints (e.g. less artifacts) and is faster than my bedslinger CR10S.