Skip Navigation

Posts
10
Comments
2952
Joined
3 yr. ago

Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman


Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!

  • And you sure distrust them despite there being zero evidence that they make up items like this.

    I would distrust their slant, but this is a video with no commentary. What slant is there?

    There's a major difference between faking shit and misrepresenting shit.

    If their facts are still true, I don't know what to say, but you do you man.

  • LMAO it's a fucking video dude. You're saying you're NOT saying it's AI while claiming it might be AI? What part of the video is real and what part is AI and what part is taken out of context. You're just pulling shit out of your ass.

  • Oh I'm sure there's plenty of sources here for this obviously surreptitiously recorded video. /s

    Dismissing the source when the facts are real is in, a word, stupid.

    Why don't you prove to me they have a history of making shit up? Oh yeah, because your own source proves that wrong, ding-a-ling.

  • Oh so claiming it's quite possibly AI isn't directly making a claim that it's most likely fake? Interesting.

  • "Don't trust this to be any more than AI" directly implies that it must be fake.

  • lmao, jesus. Sorry I asked you to read and ripped a hole in your pulled out of your ass AI theory.

    They don't have a history of making shit up. They have a history of being extremely biased. This video has no commentary.

  • It's clear they didn't actually vet the source or read what mediabiasfactcheck said then, because at no point did they make "fake news." So the likelihood of this being AI is near zero.

    Taking the top line that some group made and not actually looking at the details is not vetting a source, it's taking a quick glance as gospel. It matters that they don't make fake news because it makes this video likely real.

    But I mean you do you if you just take a quick glance as gospel and don't actually, you know, fucking read anything yourself.

  • If you read that whole page you linked to you would see they haven't produced fake news so much as they consistently misrepresent facts to suit a conservative narrative.

    So arguing it could be AI means you failed to actually read their fucking reasoning for the low credibility and bias claims. None of it had to do with facts not being true, but rather presenting those true facts within a conservative narrative. Whitmer is mentioned several times, and in each case it was rooted in real facts but presented with a conservative slant.

    Screaming "fake news" is unhelpful.

  • The quote is near the end of the audio clip and is easier to hear than the first half of the clip. We need some audio engineers isolating her voice

  • Also it's not actually "autonomous" it wouldn't have done this at all if not asked to complete a task and this how it chose to complete it.

    The LLMs don't make decisions or act on their own, they only follow directions

  • They will be blaming Biden 20 years from now, too.

  • In effect, I’m convinced they’re trying to kill us.

    I have been saying this for a decade. They know climate change is real. They plan to kill enough of us "to make it work." They want the last vestiges of the planet for themselves and their offspring.

  • I mean, I voted for Kamala, but I personally was furious at Biden because it was fucking clear as day that Netanyahu was pushing the violence to make Biden look bad for the election and get idiot leftists to do that. Biden walked right the fuck into it, he let Netanyahu manipulate him. So not only was Biden tacitly allowing a genocide to happen on his watch, he also was letting it happen knowing full well that it was happening to help Trump get elected.

    That's the part that pisses me off the most, he let the manipulation happen. (I mean the genocide pisses me off the most but Biden really didn't have a ton of stellar options, but he COULD have addressed the nation to make clear that Bibi was a Trump toadie.)

  • Look man, we're at a point where laws obviously don't mean what they're supposed to mean and entire swaths of the fucking country abuse laws to get what they want, citizens be damned.

    All I'm suggesting is we play hard ball, too. Why is it that Republicans are allowed BY DEMOCRATS to get away with shit. A replacement for McConnell should have been seated WEEKS AGO and then make the Republicans take them to court about it. But I mean I guess we should just be taking the law as sacred when the people beating us with sticks obviously don't and are using their abuse of the law to get away with beating us with sticks with no consequences. But sure, playing by the rules in a system where the other party isn't is sure to work out! Pro-tip, the rules are made up, the constitution was written by people, it's not some perfect document handed down by fucking God and it's clear that it is fundamentally a broken document by how its bee abused. The rules can change, and we shouldn't be so pussy that we are afraid to change them to fight fascism.

    This is a ONE TIME tax and Newsom doesn't even have the balls for that! Just another Democrat rolling over without a fight.

    The billionaires will never stop their fight to dominate and control. Every time we give up we're just letting them steamroll us. They will break every law, tell every lie, and propagandize the populace. But sure, we can't do one measly thing to help citizens because the billionaires might get mad and what, fight us in court? Oh no! They own the courts and plenty of us are tired of this shit.

    I'm tired of being called a Nazi by Europeans and Canadians because everyone in this country is too pussy to stand up to fascism beyond signs and slogans and doing it alone is a death sentence being shot in the street by ICE.

    Who is the uninformed one anyway? The one who recognizes we're in a fascist state, or the one still pretending we can just "trust the system." Your head is in the fucking sand, bro.

  • There is no bottom. There is no depth of depravity and cruelty they will not sink to.

    Whatever the worst you can think of, they will think of worse just for fun.

  • You know California has eminent domain laws... right? That's literally the point of those kind of laws.

    They don't have to seize it to enforce the tax, they can seize it for unrelated reasons.

    Further, eminent domain was made easier to do via a Supreme Court decision during the Bush admin in 2005.

    "Oh well the State has plans for this property, so take a hike. Eminent domain, bitches."

  • You see... They can't actually take all that land they own or the entire corporation they own and move all of it.

    They don't actually want to leave.

    There won't be any flight to enforce against. I guarantee it.

  • Soon? Buddy that's been captured.

    Israel has had the US gov in its pocket since the nation was created post-world war 2.

  • Anyone with a functioning fucking brain knew that would be the outcome!

    He didn't have a leg to stand on and started a war for NO FUCKING REASON.

    For a brief moment, it appeared that this promise might be realised. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed by the US and Iran on June 17 seemed to offer a pathway away from escalating confrontation. Markets stabilised, regional tensions eased and there was cautious optimism that Washington and Tehran had stepped back from the brink.

    Shut the fuck up. Just SHUT THE FUCK UP. He tore up the original peace deal Obama made. He started this war for no fucking reason at all other than to distract from Epstein. Stop acting like anything they fucking do is in good faith!

    Journalism is fucking DEAD