Skip Navigation

Posts
43
Comments
857
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I’m of two minds on this. I feel like this is a little bit of undemocratic action that is in service of preventing much more massive undemocratic action from happening.

    1. Stein’s candidacy, with Trump on the ballot, is a risk to democracy. She’s not on all the ballots, the odds of her winning are basically impossible, and she can only really help the guy who attempted a coup.
    2. If the state guided the Greens to use the form without county names, removing them from the ballot for this technically is pretty petty and arguably undemocratic.

    We need ranked choice voting nationally.

  • But pot is still legal in CA. This just closes the farm bill loophole that people were using to sell THC products without a license

  • I’m more annoyed that Nvidia is looked at like some sort of brilliant strategist. It’s a GPU company that was lucky enough to be around when two new massive industries found an alternative use for graphics hardware.

    They happened to be making pick axes in California right before some prospectors found gold.

    And they don’t even really make pick axes, TSMC does. They just design them.

  • Reading up on AB 1840, it looks like (from what I can grok) this would help undocumented immigrants to get more affordable loans. But they would still be loans, not grants (right?) So I don’t quite understand Newsom’s budget argument. It’s a loan. Most of the money will be coming back over 30 years.

    That said, CA’s housing supply is trash, and if this was a ballot initiative, I think you’d have a real hard time passing it. People are rightly or wrongly going to assume that this will increase competition in the buying market. When a house sells in CA’s major metros, it’s on the market for 2 weeks and the seller is sifting through dozens of offers.

  • I was just a kid at the time and I was more concerned with whether or not my Gizmo plushy would turn into a gremlin at night.

    That said, the public was pretty pissed at this court’s ruling. Why? I was too young to really comprehend it, but it was definitely a thing that dominated the news.

  • both sides of the cake

    This two sided cake analogy is a new one for me.

  • His charges were reduced because his lawyers were able to make the case that he was schizophrenic.

    Pleading insanity became much harder in the US after that Hinckley’s case. The ruling was hotly debated.

  • The article’s author seems to think this is an IPO play. Their revenue would spike over 2025 and would inflate the growth metrics for a 2026 IPO.

  • Does Canva realize that they have more in common with Microsoft’s free power point templates than Adobe CS?

  • At least they get a chance to leave a 1 star review on their way out.

  • IMHO, it’s best to get a TV with CES and a good amount of HMDI inputs with newer specs.

    Don’t connect the TV to the internet, and use external media players. That’s what I do with my Samsung.

  • Basically a lot of shows by former Fox News hosts and other far right vodcasters who are too extreme to be promoted on more mainstream platforms.

  • Videos

  • After the court slap down, he was only able to help about 1/5th to 1/6th of the original audience.

    That’s a lot of people who could stand to be reminded about what the GOP has blocked and what Harris would continue to push for.

  • How many of you have cats that look like they should be in a hair commercial?

    Edit: ITT, Send me cat pics

  • Just saying that people knew Biden was a risky candidate, and people worried that swapping out the incumbent might increase the risk.

    People were making their best guesses with the information they had at the time. The only way to know for sure is to have a multiverse Time Machine.

  • Its still crazy to me so many people wanted to keep Biden

    I get it. Changing the engine out mid-flight comes with a lot of uncertainty. Would selecting a new candidate go smoothly, would a new candidate be able to get momentum, what happens if a new candidate is worse, etc.

    Biden wasn’t great, but people were worried about all the unknowns.

  • Counter argument. When the pollsters say it’s a dead heat, listen to them.

    If don’t you want federal abortion bans and more handouts for billionaires, then you need to show up and bring your friends and family.

    It’s going to come down to a handful of votes.

  • Defense ≠ offense

    Her statement came after a week of her condemning Bibi’s offensive, saying she “will not be silent” on Gaza suffering, and ghosting Bibi during his misinformation speech to Congress.

    The GOP is now campaigning on Harris supporting terrorism. She’s trying to clarify that she’s supports defense - it’s the offense that’s killing kids that is horrid.