Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
386
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Emacs? I don't think this is going to work out...

  • I think this meme would be way better with dinosours in there.

  • This is interesting.

    Compacting garbage collector, written in very unsafe Rust

  • They'll censor "fucking", but still use the Lord's name in vain. smh.

  • Sure, but to my ears it sounds wrong and there's already a word with that meaning. I don't see the problem with correcting people and I've definitely misused or mispronounced words and I don't mind the correction.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • So they did not have twin peaks?

  • Ya, but it sounds annoying because it's incorrect.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I haven't personally found it, but that number comes from here: https://www.etymonline.com/word/aura

    Curious what you mean by recent use? It's been in my vocabulary with that meaning for at least my entire adult life (~20 years). Maybe it's just become a popular word with younger generations in the last few years?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Sure, "aura farming" might be a new saying, but the meaning of "aura" is not.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Well, "aura" is ~165 years old, so not sure if that counts as new slang.

  • They've already ruled that the president can do whatever he wants, so yeah, this is meaningless.

  • Embrace?

  • It's a perfectly cromulent word.

  • This was definitely true in the Java world when mocking frameworks only allowed you to mock interfaces.

  • "Nowadays" is one word.

  • As a Canadian I was going to suggest that we could come burn the Whitehouse down, but Trump is already on top of that.

  • You must be too young to remember when Red Hat was the darling of Linux and OSS, about 25 years ago. They proved that you could make a profit selling and supporting FOSS, and that was pretty big at the time. Since then they are a top contributor to the Linux kernel and to the OS as a whole.

    But you're kinda right, my first distro was RedHat around 1998... No idea why I didn't end up with Slackware or Debian. After that it was Mandrake, but I don't think anyone wants to talk about that...

  • Red Hat is largely responsible for Linux's success. They can do what they want and they've earned it.

    There are other options if you want free Linux.