Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
426
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • I agree except I don't think they know they are wrong. If anything, it seems they know they are right in their heads, and that's everything they care about.

  • I'm so sorry for your loss. At first, I misread "Thought" for "Tonight", so, even reading it was kind of a rollercoaster =(. Remember him, remember the happy times together.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The strip is fine. It may not be about the "babymakers", but about sexual averted people in the asexual spectrum.

  • Mozilla is not a big company, put in context.

  • So, worsening since the 1930s? Mostly, I'd agree with them.

  • I have many names for them, though, only one it's the official name. Nevertheless, I call them by their nicknames, which are numerous.

  • I don't know the others but for me, it's the constant bugging with their users. I've used Firefox since the beginning, and they have made bad choices before, but this is the last straw. I'm tired of circumventing these choices, sometimes doing so is not even that transparent as a "kill switch" and users had to find strings in a cryptic about::config page, for example.

    More important, I don't want so-called AI in my life. I couldn't care less about it. I won't use it unless it helps me to find some scientific conclusion that advances our culture, and I'm not talking something huge, I'm not saying it shouldn't be used at all. However, any use of AI for cotidian achievable tasks is morally unacceptable for me, and I'd ask for everyone a space for reflection on whether it is something filling a necessity in their lives. So, I guess it's a rupture for me with Mozilla. I can't use their product because I find it fundamentally wrong to support the massive use of technologies that barely do any good to society, and none to the planet. It's not about another little discrepancy on features and settings, it's about not giving people like me the platform to shout "fuck it, I don't want it, stop it now".

  • The way I see it, they have a proposal to make to you as a user. This is Linux, fortunately. There are plenty of choices to make, so you can try i3 or Sway to make things go exactly your way.

  • Yes. GNOME is great, but you better learn the logic behind it, it's not a DE that adjusts well to the user, it's actually the opposite, but if you get the gist of it, it works wonders.

  • I'd say in general it's the same, but way lighter than 320 kbps mp3. It's better than 192 kpbs mp3 and as good or better than 256 kbps mp3.

  • If your Spotify popularity is not 0, you probably are in the scraped archive.

  • It's not lossless but current ogg vorbis at 160kbps is absolutely transparent for the vast majority of people. That's actually what I chose to keep my own collection, I mean, outside of the lossless albums that I absolutely want to flawlessly preserve.

  • Basically, the id3 tags for the music files. However, Spotify uses several more nonstandard tags in their database, some of them are great to make playlists.

  • Needy

    Jump
  • Are they still called sex workers, then? I mean, your comment is kind of telling, as it is a bit confusing.

  • Needy

    Jump
  • What? "Extra big guys" can make serious money in the right business...

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Ewwww, but, I mean, that's Jesus Christ.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Those last "clap" sounds could be not applauses too. Still keeping it cool.

  • As if a foldable mobile was some kind of industry super secret anyway. Apple is a joke.

  • Now it's starting to make sense. Wanted to upgrade my old processor to something newer, but still AM4. Prices are stupidly high.