Again, cowboys have been skipping steps and doing things lazily and poorly well before AI. Everyone knows people who jump straight into an IDE instead of following proper workflows. Yes, skills you don't practice take a hit. In a professional setting there is such a substantial productivity hit to avoid all AI use, compared to correct and proper use. It will soon be infeasible to take such at anti AI stance and remain in the industry
Deeper down the rabbit hole, more dangerous "useless" blocks of code won't be found with "find usages" because the usage either:
isn't in the project, and is external. Like a powershell script calling a function present in the DLL, or your system's equivalent. Or even hardware accessing it directly at a known address, like an IRQ table
is accessed via reflection, which the IDE won't know about
for bonus points, the linker depends on it to make a functioning binary. Or some other dodgy code may break at runtime if offset from its original location in the binary..
There are 25 rail passenger casualties for every 100 collisions with a heavy vehicle at a crossing, of which there are 14609 collisions with trucks in the US database over a ten year period to 2021
At the same time there's a whole bunch of idiots running around thinking they know everything just because they paid the university tax and got a piece of paper
Imagine someone of average intelligence, then 50% of people are dumber than that and maybe 10% are functionally equivalently intelligent. Maybe 40% of the population are switched on, now throw in some politics and wildly different upbringing and life experience
Discussions about potential bans are supposed to remain open for at least 72 hours. While consensus that Sanger had violated Wikipedia policies was clear, Sanger was banned at some point before that deadline. He was then briefly unbanned, and then again indefinitely banned once 72 hours had elapsed and the discussion about the ban closed.
There is clearly some extreme bias on Wikipedia when they can't even follow this very normal and regularly practised rule
An article about companies forgetting to set budgets? Wow that trumps the claim that correct application of AI is more productive and cost effective than human work
Why the fuck would you give it full unfettered access to your production system?
Again, cowboys have been skipping steps and doing things lazily and poorly well before AI. Everyone knows people who jump straight into an IDE instead of following proper workflows. Yes, skills you don't practice take a hit. In a professional setting there is such a substantial productivity hit to avoid all AI use, compared to correct and proper use. It will soon be infeasible to take such at anti AI stance and remain in the industry