Rivian and Tesla are trying to hit price points with lower volumes so they are 100% aiming to reduce manufacturing costs even if it creates scenarios like this.
Loans to build data centers have stopped (red flag anyone?) so in order to pay for them they have to lay off workers. AI is killing jobs, it's just not replacing them.
So this is just a hypothetical, not an actual example of a large number of people released on cashless bail actually hurting someone?
Do you have examples showing how people who had to pay to get out of jail as opposed to cashless are less likely to murder their wives?
You're also not explaining how someone who they were willing to just let out would have had a large bail amount keeping them in jail. Your scenario makes no sense.
So if these people are not convicted and may be innocent, and whether bail is granted is determined by the risk the arrested person presents... How is cashless bail soft on crime?
The name for Chicago was made up for the world's fair exhibition to make it sound like having it in the summer pre-air conditioning would be tolerable.
I have friend with the same experience. I would call his choice of clinic a discount one though. They seemed as focused on the aspect as the financing medical one.
The feds don't lead elections. The states control elections for a very good reason.