rimu

2

Rimu @piefed.social 2d ago

I went to google.com and typed in "trump tallest building in Manhattan" and there it was.

This extension helps a lot - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nogoogleai/

Rimu @piefed.social 2d ago

The omarchy website lists them.

Rimu @piefed.social 5d ago

https://piefed.social/c/fediverse@piefed.social/p/2190040/who-decides-what-you-see-on-the-fediverse-a-look-at-voting-patterns

PieFed instance admins can set a limit to how many votes each account can cast each day. I set the default value for this at a level that 99% of us will never reach.

This pissed off some of the 1% (or people who thought they were the 1% but weren't) so they spent weeks spreading FUD about it.

1

Rimu @piefed.social 1w ago

2-3 times a week is nothing. 2-3 per day is completely fine.

It would only be used for the most flagrant accounts, ones with some level of automation - dozens of posts per day with almost no comments. That sort of thing.

I too find content on other networks (mostly Mastodon, occasional YouTube) and post them here. Often a few per day. But it's all completely manual and I usually rewrite the description, add hashtags, etc. And I'll interact with people who comment on the posts. Cross-pollination of content is normal and good.

There's a point though, usually enabled by using some extra software tools like the one above, where someone ends up flooding their target communities, not responding to comments on the posts, looking inauthentic when they repost OC which plainly isn't theirs and causing extra moderation work because their content is in the wrong places. Sanitation is the most obvious example of this but there are others.

Despite this, a lot of people upvote and comment on their posts. I don't know if

they're even aware of who the author is. Most apps do not emphasise this strongly so it's easy to miss.
if they are aware then are they aware that the author is ignoring them and won't learn from the feedback they're getting?

... Or if they don't care. Maybe they're just content with the conversation in the comments without the OPs involvement. That's valid (although not the kind of conversation I personally want to be a part of).

It's probably a combination of don't know and don't care. For those people, labelling sanitation et al as a bot would seem heavy-handed. That's why I'm leaning towards creating an in-between state, for these kinds of centaur accounts.

5

Rimu @piefed.social 1w ago

YSK that I've tagged all those accounts as bots on piefed.social.

Unlike on Lemmy, on PieFed people can choose to still see bot-generated posts but have them semi-transparent which makes them easy to scroll past OR interact with if you want. As well as the Lemmy option of just filtering them out entirely.

e.g. like this example:

I've also been thinking that a binary "this is a bot" or "this is human" flag is too limited and we need a third option - "this is a reposter" and people could choose to make-transparent, filter out or show their posts independently of the bot-or-not setting.

Rimu @piefed.social 1w ago

FYI every post you make is tagged as NSFW

4

Rimu @piefed.social 1w ago

Yup. If there's anywhere that can absorb the umm influx of 5000 stir-crazy men all at once, it's Pattaya. Plus every bar girl from Bangkok will be there to lend a hand - it's only a couple of hours drive away.