Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
2
Comments
387
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If they did, it's still entirely possible to use your own e2ee for messages between friends on any app just by using an encrypted keyboard app on your phone (like KryptEY).

  • it's not paranoia if they're really out to get you

  • assuming it actually listens to you. in the past people have had settings randomly turn back on.

  • URLs can have newlines too

  • I think your own statements here are pretty elitist.

    "As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding."

  • Maybe a better question might be why all the upvotes. Perhaps that already answers one of your questions.

  • it doesn't

  • I think the article fails to take several critical factors into consideration.

    • The complexity of dealing with such large amounts of information will keep increasing forever as the amount of information also grows
    • AI struggles with conflicting information and mistakes, which happen a lot especially when humans are involved, so eventually you will have lots of "garbage in garbage out" issues causing problems
    • The data one might be able to track will continuously be challenged or removed on legal/compliance bases over time, reducing its availability

    For example: Yes the NSA might want our chatbot logs, but after enough people realize they might be/are getting them, people will stop feeding it as much, or introduce noise on purpose. It's not a perfect vacuum of constant reliable information forever. We are already seeing that AI models learning from web results are getting caught up in their own slop making themselves dumber. And the sheer volume of information relative to the computing power necessary to process everything will also become a problem if they keep trying to process every single thing.

  • No it can't. This story keeps getting posted all over the internet.

    Not only is it wrong, and not only do the researchers refuse to show their work (citing possible "misuse"), but it entirely depends on what kind of OPSEC failures the user happens to make.

  • No it can't... all this paper talks about is correlating OPSEC failures which any human can do and not related to the name you use.

    They don't even publish their exact methodology, like prompts or other tools "for safety." So their findings are literally just "trust me bro."

  • I swear people will never be happy no matter what.

    No AI features? Get with the times man.

    AI features? High treason.

    Opt-out? Not good enough.

    Opt-in? Nobody will use it.

    Can't please everyone I guess.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I wonder if you need to explicitly prompt it to check if a function really exists before suggesting it? Think about how a human brain works... we are constantly evaluating whether or not things are really true based on info in our heads... but we are not telling the models to do the same thing and instead they just yolo some shit that is confidently-wrong (not unlike many humans, admittedly).

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Why?

  • So you're saying people shouldn't want nice features?

  • How are they able to auto-play audio even when my browser is set to block that?

  • IMO The problem isn't so much getting them to know about it, the problem is getting them to care.

  • So 1 month becomes... 2 years?

  • yes