There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this... it's not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Protest forks never survive though. They always start overly ambitious and then realize how much of a full-time job it really is, and eventually give up.
Yes, yes I do. They know you can't control everyone. And Linux is a rounding error in the context of desktop market share. They don't care about it, and everyone else is "good enough."
Lawmakers don't even know or care what Linux is. They don't know what a router is or that it runs an operating system. The bill doesn't affect routers because they don't have physical users with HIDs plugged into them. They're not targeting them. Captive portals have been around for decades. What on Earth are you talking about?
I don't see it catching on at all... I think forcing people to record themselves is asking way too much, and not everyone uses the command-line or the same application/machine for everything. Plus they acknowledge that it can be faked and that LLMs can/will get better at faking it.
Proving a request came from a human is a many-billion dollar task right now, and nobody seems close at all to coming up with a workable solution. The only thing even remotely feasible (IMO) that I've seen so far (and which still doesn't actually prove anything) is charging money for accounts. But tons of people still don't want to do that, even though it would lessen the amount of bots and make it easier to ban bad behavior if everyone needed an account to access a site. I don't like that option, but it is an option. Making payments on the web easier (and less tied to the whims of Visa et al) probably also needs to happen.
Doesn't explain how to use it at all. Tried clicking on the extension in the toolbar, nothing happens.
I need something that works on lazy-loading carousels and automatically grabs all the images that are linked through another lazy-loaded lightbox you have to click on for each one.
Companies don't like legally-questionable (in their mind at least) licenses. If you look at the people who use this license, it's mostly very small personal projects.
I think that assumes that people are actually auditing all the code, and carefully enough. I think most people greatly overestimate how much code is actually ever audited.
Source: