Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
1
Comments
204
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yeah! The "timbre" (which despite how it looks is said "tamber") of an instrument is its audio "profile". It's what makes a piano different than a flute, or on a more subtle level makes one piano slightly different from another.

    But here's the nuts part: what makes up the timbre of an instrument is a bunch of different resonating bits all resonating together. Essentially the reason a flute sounds like a flute is because it comes "pre-loaded" with a boatload of simple waveforms already added together. When you play a note on one, you get the main pitch you're playing, but the instrument's body and your breath all also produce a whack-ton of side tones all playing at the same time. And like a fingerprint, our ear/brain hears all these bits start and stop together and says "that's a flute".

    So it's the same process, really: simple bits adding together. But "flute sound" isn't the atom. It's made up of a bunch of simple waves already added together, which then gets added to the other sounds that sound like pianos or guitars, which produces the final mix.

    I don't know if you'll get anything out of it, but you could look up videos of a "modular synth" setting up a trumpet sound or something. These devices have simple electronic tone generators, but by layering them and plugging them into each other, and using effects and the like, they can start to mimic the timbre of a trumpet or whatever. By essentially adding together the "key bits" of the harmonics (these other waves) they can start to approach the feeling of a trumpet sound, but just with simple, raw, parts.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Highly basic answer, let's say the strength of the vocals wave over time is:

    5, 4, 3, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4

    And drums is:

    4, 0, 2, 0, 4, 0, 2, 3

    Then you add them together for each time slice and get:

    9, 4, 5, 2, 7, 4, 7, 7

    And you put that on a record, or out to a speaker, and our ears are able to break that up into the two parts when it hears it. This is the same as when two things are in the room making sound, there may be two sources, but my ear only has one hole, and that hole has one eardrum behind it. The different sounds just add their powers together and hit my ear as one mixed wave.

    Alternative answer: magic

  • Yeah! We call those "Cascading Failures"

    They're a nightmare! 😄

  • That's totally fair! It was a little intuition, a lot of "going with the gut", and a bit of flair, it's true. But I figured if none of this resonates with OP at all, they can choose to ignore me as full of shit 😛

  • To piggy back off this one, because I liked it, I'd like to zoom in on the spouse's reaction. Yes, it's an expression of their love. But also, if they're the sort of person that feels gift-giving is important, then they probably struggle with you being hard to buy for, because they want to get you something, because that's how they demonstrate love and attention.

    So probably they've been watching you, and they noticed you spend a lot of time with this item, and they thought if they got you a new or fancy version it would make for a great gift. They finally found something they know you'll like! They'll watch you open it, you'll light up, and thank them for their keen insight, attention, and creativity. The perfect gift.

    Obviously it didn't go down that way, but I think in addition to just "rejecting their love", I imagine there's also a huge factor that is just shock and disappointment. They had high expectations, they were excited for the reveal, and what they got was so much worse than what they expected they just don't even know what to do with this energy. They may even be a little embarrassed, both that they got you a bad gift, and at their misplaced excitement.

    It's just an emotional letdown for them, I imagine. Now depending on their emotional maturity, they may just need to collect themselves, realize this whole thing was their fault for getting their hopes up even though you've told them you're not interested. They'll realize you have good reasons to want to keep the old one, and that they overlooked the importance of it. And if they don't have that level of mindfulness, then they may calm down, but they'll still blame you fully.

    Anyway, just wanted to point out what I expect the source of the "outsized"-feeling reaction might be. Acute, sudden onset, disappointment.

  • One small step for ham...

  • "Imagine appearing for a job interview and, without saying a single word, being told that you are not getting the role because your face didn’t fit. You would assume discrimination, and might even contemplate litigation. But what if bias was not the reason?

    Uh... guys...

    Discrimination: the act, practice, or an instance of unfairly treating a person or group differently from other people or groups on a class or categorical basis

    Prejudice: an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge

    Bias: to give a settled and often prejudiced outlook to

    Judging someone's ability without knowing them, based solely on their appearance, is, like, kinda the definition of bias, discrimination, and prejudice. I think their stupid angle is "it's not unfair because what if this time it really worked though!" 😅

    I know this is the point, but there's no way this could possibly end up with anything other than a lazily written, comically clichéd, Sci Fi future where there's an underclass of like "class gammas" who have gamma face, and then the betas that blah blah. Whereas the alphas are the most perfect ughhhhh. It's not even a huge leap; it's fucking inevitable. That's the outcome of this.

    I should watch Gattaca again...

  • Technically they are the 2fa. The second factor is something you have. I store all my passkeys in my password manager too, so I'm not faulting you, but technically that's just undoing the second factor, because now my two factors are "two things that are both unlocked by the same one thing I know". Which is one complicated factor spread across two form fields.

  • I think that's relevant to the discussion though. Most people sit like two feet from their gaming monitor and lean forward in their chair to make the character go faster.

    But most people put a big TV on the other side of a boring white room, with a bare white ikea coffee table in between you and it, and I bet it doesn't matter as much.

    I bet the closest people ever are to their TV is when they're at the store buying it...

  • Oh yeah, I really liked Control and recommended someone else play it. He didn't make it far and I asked why not and he said the upgrade system and the crafting... and I was like what crafting?

    He said the way you turn figments or whatever into upgrades or whatever. And I was like "oh yeah, that rings a bell... I just didn't do any of that".

    I don't always have this power, but in this case I was apparently able to ignore entire chunks of the game and enjoy what was left. So I have a weird skewed view of the game 😛

  • Yeah, holy shit. This isn't some hippy caricature at a park, but mayor of arguably the 4th largest city in North America. That's nuts, but I'm glad to see it. Wild times...

  • Unsure if.... fuck it I'll just blow it open.

    The context is that loge has a shortcut called "ln", that is L N, said lawn, for "natural logarithm" (but in... Latin probably?)

    And so the joke is that "ln" looks like "in" in this context.

  • Fully understandable... almost. I'll admit I'm a little confused to hear there's a porn addiction in the mix. Not in a judgement kinda way, porn can be fine for some people, but I don't normally associate heavy porn usage with low-libido?

    Again, neither is inherently wrong, I'm just surprised and wonder if maybe I misread the situation, you know?

  • One thing I'd be curious about for you, if you'd be open to it, would be looking for someone in the poly community. Obviously people in the poly community tend to be on the more sexual side of the spectrum, but not all such people are always exclusively about sex. Counter-intuitively you may be able to find someone in that community that can go your speed, not because they live at that speed naturally, but because you aren't their only outlet for that stuff, so they may be fine with you being just a romantic partner. And there's no reason you need to have multiple partners, so long as you're okay with your partner having multiple partners.

    The most obvious risk is if you're romantically jealous, besides the more obvious sexually jealous. That may be a deal-breaker. And if you're looking for someone to be with you at all times, that's probably not going to work either.

    But if you approach it was openness and a "what have I got to lose" attitude, you may be able to find some low-pressure companionship!

    Quick note if you look into it: you may see the term "solo poly". And you may think this either means a poly person currently only with a single partner, or maybe a poly person that is currently unpartnered. These would be good guesses but also wrong! Solo poly is a person who essentially has relationships with other people, but always secondary to their relationship with themselves. Effectively they're not looking to move in together or "get too serious" or whatever, just dating, and they maintain a "solo lifestyle". This doesn't have to mean nothing is long term, it doesn't have to mean it's only casual hookups, but if you're looking for a life partner or someone to wake up next to every morning or do taxes with, this isn't their vibe.

    Good luck!

  • Glad I could help 😛

    Naturally, normal qualifiers apply: everyone exists at some place on a spectrum, this does not describe all experiences, etc.

    But given the numbers and vibe of comments, it seems like it resonates with some people who aren't you 😉

  • You know when you're talking to someone and they have maybe a crumb or flake on their face, and you can't help but be drawn to watch it just in case it falls, but whether it does or doesn't fall that wouldn't impact you in any way? But it's distracting anyway?

    That's all women's chests. I'm not lecherous, I have a wife and female friends, I'm vigilant and keep it in check, but I'm compelled to check on them over and over. My wife's, stranger's, doesn't matter. Even if I've seen my wife's every day while she was changing for 11 years. What if they were to sway a certain way? What if there was a slight bounce and I missed it? What if the fabric became taut and revealed a line beneath. Or a shape. Perhaps a slight nub in the center? Was that there a second ago? Does that mean anything? I'd better check back to see if it changes again. The buttons on her blouse are slightly stretched, and if she moves just right I may be able to see a glimpse of skin. Not breast skin, goodness no, just any skin currently covered by the shirt. If I'm lucky it'll have some shadow on it to imply shape. This dress has a dip in the front. I wonder if I could... It would never reveal anything. It wouldn't. But what if it did. I can't know unless I look. This shirt is slightly sheer in the light. What's beneath?

    The fabric stretched across her backside displays lines when she bends slightly forward. Now I know she's wearing underwear. I mean, of course she is, everyone is... but now I know she is. And its shape. Her bum looks soft. Cushioned. If I were up against it I could really- No! No. But I could. And it would press against me. Stop it. And I could reach forward from behind, slide my hands up her sides and cup her- No! No Goddammit! They look like they'd be soft. In my hands.

    The older woman in black's shirt just slid slightly up above her waistline, revealing a sliver of skin. There was nothing unexpected or special about this skin. It wasn't overtly attractive, but I saw it. It was covered and I saw it. Does she know I saw it? I'm glad I saw it.

    The waitress in the tight shirt smiled at me. She's younger than me, but not too young. Right? No. I mean, it'd be a little creepy, but not like... creepy creepy right? And maybe she's into that? Probably not, it's clearly all about tips. She's a professional, she knows what she's doing. Yeah she does... Besides, what could even happen. I'm getting dinner, with my wife, and she probably doesn't even get off for hours. But... just statistically some younger women are into older guys right? And I'm not complete dogshit. It's clearly about just being nice, it's part of the service industry. Is it so unbelievable that any woman could find me attractive? Is that fucking impossible? No but- She smiled while looking into my eyes. That's something right? No. It's not, I was just passing the machine back to her after paying. Her lips look soft. Maybe no one's ever kissed her well before. Like sure she's probably had a lot of male interest, but they were probably all douchebags. They probably didn't even care about her pleasure. I could. I mean I would. Like, if I weren't here and she weren't here and we met at a different time and place and things were casual, I think she'd be lucky for me to show her... What the fuck am I even...

    When she turned to leave a thin line of her underwear flashed briefly above her yoga pants. Now I know they're blue.

  • Oh, the human interaction is annoying! Yeah gotcha. That makes more sense!

  • git log will only show you commits in your history. If you're only ever working forwards, this will contain all the stuff you'll ever need.

    But if you're rewriting history, like with a rebase or squash or something, or you're deleting branches without merging them, then you can run into a situation where the official history of your branch doesn't contain some of the commits that used to exist, and in fact still exist but are unlinked from anywhere. So reflog is the log of where you've been, even if where you've been isn't in the official history anymore, so you can find your way back to previous states even if there isn't otherwise a name for them.

    If all you care about is your current history, git can use the dates of commits just fine to see where you were on Thursday without needing the reflog.

  • Maybe I'm just a wizard, or I don't know what y'all are talking about, but rebases aren't special. If you use git reflog it just tells you where you used to be before the rebase. You don't have to fix anything, git is append only. See where the rebase started in reflog, it'll say rebase in the log line, then git reset --hard THAT_HASH

    Pushing without fetching should be an error. So either they got the error, didn't think about it, and then force pushed, or someone taught them to just always force push. In either case the problem is the force part, the tool is built to prevent this by default.

    Continuing after merge should be pretty easy? I'd assume rebase just does it? Unless the merge was a squash merge or rebase merge. Then yeah, slightly annoying, but still mostly git rebase -i and then delete lines look like they were already merged?