Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
1
Comments
1321
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Human species before H. Sapiens

  • Instead they're probably paying Canonical

  • Yeah it's outside my expertise so I'm bad at the detail.

    Normal process is the nice efficient anaerobic process that produces ATP from glucose

    Cancers use an all aerobic process which is less efficient but faster at producing ATP

  • Most places have double tax agreements with the US. They'll be reporting their income to the US, but only paying tax to the US on money earned in the US, from shares for example

  • Normal function is sugar to ATP, then the mitochondria use ATP. In humans it's only broken ATP that uses sugar directly

  • When this happens, the mitochondria start burning sugars using oxygen as a fuel source

    That's also (almost?) universal in human cancers

  • They make smaller chairs. Blame your employer for not buying sufficient variety. Also a proper ergonomic chair should be able to bring the back forward or the seat back

    Or get a cushion to put behind you

  • That's every 10 minutes for looking at something far away

  • One of my mates goes to a chiro. The rest of us detail for him how our problems were helped by physios and they were fixed, and stayed fixed, while he needs to see a chiro every 3 months for just exactly the same problems

    He describes himself as an idiot, and I believe him. He still goes to a chiro.

    Australia has high respect for chiropractic because the King likes them, and when he was a prince he was pretty influential too. No idea why it would be popular outside the Commonwealth

  • It was genuine, in my workplace the only optimisation is for run time

  • I took Gray on productivity as a suggestion that those methods don't help you get stuff done

    Though I do still use the Getting Things Done method for my work email

    I dropped off his patreon when he changed it from per video to per month. I don't think he's made anything significant since the paper scissors rock set

  • Isn't that what you're optimising? Trying to reduce runtime by increasing CPU load

  • It's a fake teapot, you can't brew tea in it

  • Some people use the RGB to indicate system loads by colour, so they can have a visual indicator for when a long process finishes

  • Waterfall is much more expensive than any of the agile methods, even with good requirement gathering and management

  • I know several who preferred waterfall, but the system I work on is a giant government one and when we were doing waterfall we were in specialist teams working on a small part of the system

    At the same time we went agile management also said "everyone can do everything" so we've had to work across the entire system

    For the rocket analogy: we started building a rocket under waterfall, but when we went agile we also decided that the rocket motor specialists could also work on fuel tanks and heat shields

  • We recently saw waterfall versus agile in actual rockets

    Blue Origin spent years meticulously designing their rocket. They tested it on the ground. On the first flight it got to orbit, but the first stage exploded while re-entering

    SpaceX started building their rocket out of carbon fibre. Changed to stainless steel. Started flying subscale demos, flew high altitude full scale examples to find if their aerodynamics was right, and haven't actually tried for orbit yet

    Blue Origin is trying for a last generation rocket (where the first stage is recovered) but bigger, SpaceX is trying to create the next generation where both stages are recovered

  • Also thank you for getting me to think on this, unless I'm challenged I often don't know how I came to an idea