Im going to assume the DNC does not consider Gaza a loss vector because the DNC had the same attitude towards Gaza as the opponents.
If so it would reveal a good bit about how flawed their entire approach is.
It would not be about principles or absolute stands, but just about having better optics and taking populist relative positions on any topics of the day.
Reagan sure sold authentic, charismatic, and empathetic vibes to get elected. And he had the Bush family push.
Trump just sold intelligence (dont ask me how), charisma, and empathy to the dumbest and the bigoted. The wealthy and the supremists were already on board.
Jon may well have all 4 aspects down, but he is too close to the establishmemt democrats and the financial economy, imo.
Kinda wish we had a peanut farming, nuclear engineer that we could turn to.
Im pretty sure that is a "no, not this time" answer.
I think she knows where she can do the most good, and survive to do the most good.
I like AOC but i dont think she is ready for the international political scene. I think she knows it as well. Domestic issues need her more, which happens in Congress.
And Jon Stewart, well i like him too but ... another celebrity/actor president? Really?
All using a program written by a program that a human can not debug or trace the logic of because any source code existed only as an intermediate step in memory.
Let that decide the fate of millions, billions, and trillions.
Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad.