doing that involves a ton of googling and reading awful documentation
Yes. That is programming.
To most of us, the syntax is the easy part to remember, and our IDEs take care of most of it. Being able to bang our heads through the documentation and experiment with libraries is pretty much what our jobs are.
AI coding is basically a shortcut to some of the stuff we have to repeat with slight changes in our software. It's also useful for setting up more complex code that we know we'll have to tweak.
Expecting it to produce something with the desired results is a recipe for disaster. It's basically a cheaper outsourcing method that can't actually compile and run it's code before giving it to you.
ChatGPT is an LLM that is a generative pre-trained model using a nueral network.
Aka: it's a chat bot that creates it's responses based on an insane amount of text data. LLMs trace back to the 90s, and I learned about them in college in the late 2000s-2010s. Natural Language Processing was a big contributor, and Google introduced some powerful nueral network tech in 2014-2017.
The reason they "appeared out of nowhere" to the common man is merely marketing.
If the current leading theory of dark matter being a fundamental particle means that there were "two big bangs" why would the dark big bang have to appear second?
10 to 30? Yeah I think it might be a lot longer than that.
Somehow everyone keeps glossing over the fact that you have to have enormous amounts of highly curated data to feed the trainer in order to develop a model.
Curating data for general purposes is incredibly difficult. The big medical research universities have been working on it for at least a decade, and the tools they have developed, while cool, are only useful as tools too a doctor that has learned how to use them. They can speed diagnostics up, they can improve patient outcome. But they cannot replace anything in the medical setting.
The AI we have is like fancy signal processing at best
So I was thinking about this. When is the last time you were in a room with a billionaire in any sort of non-secure facility?
At least in the US, it's not like they go just anywhere. They also almost always have bodyguards.
I've been to a few conferences with a billionaire in attendance, and the event itself was very secure just because it had IP in the event center.
I later learned that the building itself had an entirely separate entrance and exit for VIPs. Not like run of the mill VIPs, VIPs that owned helicopters that took them too and from the airport.
Apparently it's very common. Most notably are hospitals with private entrances and exits needed protect patient privacy. I think it's a lot harder than we think.
That's really strange. A true authoritarian power would want all knowledge of the previous administration, as it gives them complete power in specifically what they can subvert without risking their grasp on power.
This, honestly, sounds like Trump's team truly believes that the corporate hostile takeover can be used in the government to some effect. That's going to have consequences they can't even begin to predict.
That means they really think that people will only respond to fear, and never rebel against a superior power. But more importantly, before violence becomes the outcome, it means an economic disaster the size the world has never seen.
The billionaires supporting this are ultimately shooting themselves in the foot, because they can't see what happens when people don't value what they own.
I knew it was bloody and thousands had been slaughtered, but I'm so surprised they fought back. I never learned they actually had the chance to. So many survivors and observers too. That's reassuring.
It means that the Chinese know their government is not omnipotent. That's why all legal communication is unencrypted and monitored. If citizens were allowed to communicate as they do in the West, they'd be able to organize and overthrow the CCP.
That's what they are afraid of. The people aren't afraid of the mechanized power the PLA has, and as demonstrated in 1989, the power is in numbers. If the CCP doesn't wipe out all memory of Tiannemen Square, they are doomed. But the CCP can't. Unless they cut China off from the rest of the world entirely, the knowledge will remain. The CCP can only get stricter and harsher, speeding up the time for a pressure cooker to explode. They know this. The people know this.
At some point in the future, they will go too far, and the people will end it.
The deep red seat can't be understated. That part of Minnesota makes absofuckinglutely no sense in its political distribution. It's got what, two or three college towns, the Mayo Clinic, and the rest is a mix of redneck "country types" and farmers.
Super highly educated area, but not densely populated. Big ol bunch of religious types too.
A lot of people seem to ignore that presidents who were particularly effective were lawyers.
Clinton (economic boom of the 90s), Obama (cleaning up Bush Jr's mess), FDR (New Deal, WW2), Wilson (Antitrust laws, regulatory acts), Taft (16th amendment), Harrison (regulatory and national Forest laws), Arthur, Lincoln, Jefferson, Adams.
Having a former state prosecuting attorney running in an election is bringing the big guns to anyone who tries to be argumentative. Battles she chooses to take, she wins. Battles she won't have a choice in? She's going to get the best possible outcome.
If the ultra right cared about arguments, the GOP wouldn't stand a chance. They might as well be talking to the barrel of a tank.
I didn't pay a dime (other than living expenses) for my tuition. Fuck everyone who is against debt forgiveness. I worked hard to become a software engineer, but do you think I could have done it while working full time at the same time just to pay tuition? Even if I didn't work during college, I would have had to live the college quality living for several years before I would have made enough to pay tuition and living.
Education is the single most important thing for a society to progress and everyone to do better, live better, and create better. Anyone against it? Tells you all you need to know. They benefit from an uneducated population, that struggles on low wages for their own personal profit.
Yes. That is programming.
To most of us, the syntax is the easy part to remember, and our IDEs take care of most of it. Being able to bang our heads through the documentation and experiment with libraries is pretty much what our jobs are.
AI coding is basically a shortcut to some of the stuff we have to repeat with slight changes in our software. It's also useful for setting up more complex code that we know we'll have to tweak.
Expecting it to produce something with the desired results is a recipe for disaster. It's basically a cheaper outsourcing method that can't actually compile and run it's code before giving it to you.