Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
0
Comments
275
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I believe that people's views are shaped by... Almost everything.

    Every movie, TV show, book, comic, song. It's almost always a husband and wife, boyfriend and girlfriend. Or a single person looking for their "other half". Or someone in a monogamous relationship who is cheating. Or getting cheated on.

    Monogamous relationships in media can either be the focus or just a background detail. Non-monogamous relationships are almost always treated as gimmicks. TV Shows like Big Love or Sister Wives. Harem animes. That kind of thing.

    I am really struggling to think of media that portrays non-monogamy as just a normal thing. Maybe media where casual hookups are a thing might count for you? But I see that as a person being fundamentally single usually, not polyamorous.

    And there's also incidental media. Advertisements, packaging, etc. The existence of "family size" implies a standard sized family.

    Beyond media, there's all of the other examples they have. Parents, grandparent, aunts, uncles, cousins, teachers, coaches. I think everyone has a subconscious push to copy what they have seen elsewhere in relationships, and it takes a good bit of self-reflection and purposeful change to get out of that.

    For me personally, my awakening was when I read Stranger in a Strange Land as a teen. The whole book got me in the habit of analyzing relationships of all kinds. That included a section of the book where the main character starts a cult, and the whole cult is basically one big polycule. It was just a small section of the book and it was presented as so... Normal.

    We tend to think of "marriage" as like a combo meal at a fast food restaurant- it's the #1, a burger, fries, and a drink. A small house, a white fence, a shared bank account. Someone to be with spiritually, emotionally, sexually, politically, financially, nutritionally (I've seen veganism lead to divorce), and in so many other ways. But it doesn't have to be. Some people sleep in separate beds, or separate rooms. Some people get married but keep separate houses or apartments. Some people keep separate bank accounts.

    Even then, I read the book as a teenager and was kind of open to the idea, but never thought it would work in practice. Eventually I started dating my wife who is bi, and the topic of threesomes came up. We ended up having a successful one with a friend of hers she had a crush on for a while. We briefly looked into trying some exhibition, so same-room sex with other couples. Found some people online and went to dinner with a few but never really materialized.

    About a year ago another couple we were friends with propositioned. They were both bi, had been monogamous for roughly a decade, and wanted some gayness in their bedroom. I'm like, mostly straight, but for me this presented a lot of rare opportunities for new experiences. So now I have a boyfriend and a non-binary girlfriend in addition to my wife.

  • I also notice that I don't pay attention to usernames on Lemmy

    I'm not sure if this is a Lemmy-wide thing or if it's just because I use the Connect app, but I can add User Notes that function as a little tag next to people's usernames. Since I started doing that I've noticed just how small Lemmy is, or at least how few people actually are posting content.

    Most of my notes are just to let me know not to bother getting into arguments with them on stuff. Conservative trolls, tankies, AI slop enthusiasts,, people who steal content from others, etc. But occasionally I'll mark someone down as a notable quality poster.

  • ISIS enforced abstinence too. It makes their members easier to agitate and more violent, less rational. Plus it lets them promise a reward in the afterlife.

  • Don't forget about distracting with a war against Venezuela. Or Iran. Or Panama. Or Greenland/Denmark.

  • As someone familiar with Adam Ellis, I read this and kept looking for more panels where he would take the joke from subtle to obvious.

  • at a concert

    There's your problem. It doesn't matter if you're buying Dasani or Aquafina or Arizona Tea. Venues have captive audiences and jack up the prices because they can.

  • As of June 2025, Mike Cessario’s estimated net worth is around $80–100 million.

    The CEO is wealthy, sure, but very far away from being a billionaire.

    I've occasionally bought liquid death at my local beer distributor for parties, and it's a bit expensive but not crazy. Pretty much every drink at a festival is incredibly overpriced - that markup is usually going to the vendors selling it and the venue, not the manufacturer.

  • The idea that Bubba is Bill Clinton is the part I have a hard time believing. And I think it might be a joke. But I also think it's possible that Trump performed oral on someone or something named Bubba.

    I've never heard that nickname for Bill Clinton before. Maybe I live under a rock or maybe it's a private nickname that could be corroborated elsewhere in the Epstein files, but idk he's never looked like a "Bubba" to me.

    More critically, I have a hard time believing the 2016 election cycle plays out the way it did if this were the case.

    But I do think it's clear there's SOMETHING that Trump doesn't want the public to know about. And I don't think he or his base care about him being with 16 year old girls. Or even his daughter. What could it be that Trump would be scared of his base knowing about?

    So I think Bubba could be another dude. Or perhaps a gigantic novelty dildo. Or maybe even an animal.

    Edit: For everyone getting caught up in the nickname, Mark Epstein has said that it wasn't Bill Clinton. Plus, even if you don't believe him it still doesn't make sense that it's Bill with how 2016 played out.

  • I have wondered this for a while. All the stuff with the child's beauty pageants. The "grab them by the pussy" comment. The various quotes about liking young women, calling his own daughter hot, etc. Even without the Epstein files it's pretty clear that his base is not bothered by him sexually assaulting you girls.

    At the same time, he's scared of something. Putin clearly has something over him, or at least did during his first term. The speculation back then was some sort of "piss tape" with a Russian prostitute, but... Would his base really be bothered by that? And if not, what exactly could Truml have done that his base WOULD care about?

    The rumor I started seeing this morning makes more sense: that there is evidence of Trump giving a blowjob to Bill Clinton. I think any evidence of Trump doing any sort of submissive act with another man would cost him his base.

    Bill Clinton would be especially egregious as a hated Democrat, and there IS a relationship and connection there i could see but it almost seems too ridiculous to be true. And like... He ran against Hillary Clinton. Surely if that happened and evidence existed, it would have gotten out before now, right? Or at the very least the Clintons could have used that aseverage to get Trump to drop his campaign. So I'm not sure I buy that rumor. But it could have been another guy. Or anyone with a dick.

    Another thought I have is that there is a common trope in the BDSM scene where people tend towards sexual roles that oppose their "normal" daily roles. Powerful men like to dominate everywhere else, but like to be submissive in the bedroom. I wonder if it could even be something as innocuous as video of Trump going down on one of his wives that he is afraid of leaking.

  • I think the main hangup is going to be: how easy and simple is this thing for the average person?

    The Steam Deck is, any way you slice it, a better value than the Switch or Switch 2. The Steam Deck has sold roughly 6 million units in 3 years. The Nintendo Switch 2 has sold close to 11 million units in about 5 months.

    I hope you're right and that Valve really shakes up the whole industry, but I'm not going to start expecting that until I see it.

  • I already gave an example of how real world racists love to use crime statistics as arguments to justify their bigotry. You referencing (without citing) crime statistics is to meaningful.

    But even if we look at statistics, the majority of sexual assault cases are between people who know each other, not random strangers.

    This isn't about protecting anyone. It's about Uber selling women on the concept of safety and charging a premium for it, and they are leveraging a culture war in the process.

  • Your arguments sound incredibly familiar.

    "Not all trans women are bad, but enough if then are predators that we need to ban them from women's restrooms and sports!".

    "Not all Mexicans are bad, but the ones who are trying to cross the border into the US are criminals and need to be stopped!"

    "I've heard of a white woman who said she was raped by a black man, and that's why we need segregation!"

    "Women are so delicate and helpless that we need special rules to protect them!"

    The consequences are negligible for men

    They are if you assume that the services would be "sperate but equal". Wait a minute... Where have I heard that one before?

    Racists love to talk about crime statistics and claim (erroneously) that they could eliminate 50% of the crime by removing 13% of the population. Is it worth the cost of dehumanization? Is it worth sewing divisions within society? Is it worth just brushing marginalized groups aside and pretending they don't exist?

    This program is all of the red flags of segregation and prejudice. It always ends the same way, every time it's been tried. There's no way that you can safely slice up populations of people without leading to the same issues that it always brings.

  • Wow you're making a whole hell of a lot of assumptions and generalizations about trans and non-binary folks.

    What exactly are we trying to get women away from here? People with Y chromosomes? Well, that includes trans women. People with testosterone? Well that includes trans men. People with muscles? There's significant overlap between the most muscular woman and the least musclar man. People wearing men's clothing? Well then that opens up conversations about cis cross dressers and drag artists, let alone greater discussions about clothing and fashion trends over time, let alone non-binary people.

    You cannlt execute this solution without hand waiving away some amount of bigotry and prejudice. That is because it is a bigoted and prejudiced idea.

  • It's segregation. Its pre-judging people based on their gender. And even if you can justify to yourself that it's okay to discriminate against men... What about trans people? Non-binary people? What happens when some straight woman complains that aesbian driver made them uncomfortable?

    It was a great idea to protect women until anyone takes 5 seconds to think about it.

  • For me it was how easily they slipped in the phrase "Epstein shutdown" that gave it away. That just seems so clearly phrased by someone who always hated Trump cosplaying as victim of a face eating leopard.

  • Increase productivity?

  • Which is why if we started making memes attributing behaviors to people who are just... Not sick... It would be really weird and innacurate.

    Or like, what about people who are sick and are just having a good day? Or people who are sick but their meds are working so they don't look like it from the outside? Maybe they are sick, but they just have a runny nose and not the cough you're expecting?

    The meme could have very easily been captioned "someone telling me about mindsets and positive thinking" and it would be perfectly fine. But, for no reason other than to sew hostility and division, OP added a bunch of irrelevant identity politics into the mix.

  • Do you go around to people who aren't coughing and label them "sickless"?