Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
345
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • Okay, but that's just the opinion of one rapist genocide-denier

  • What am I defending, do you even know?

  • Huh?

  • Lmao, how are you mad about what you think is an unsubstantiated claim and going around saying this? Show your work. ‘You can’t prove this is transphobic to my standards’ is not proof someone is not transphobic. Unless that’s the conclusion you want to reach to begin with.

    I have interacted with Rimu enough to know he's absolutely not anti-Leftist or anti-trans. But the fact that you think asking someone to prove a negative is sound reasoning says a lot.

    Answer why Mia is responsible for someone else’s conclusions.

    No one said she was. Stop making things up.

    Lmao, imagine telling a trans person they’re tokenizing themself by recognizing a duck that’s walking and quacking like a duck. Absolute cringe shit.

    You're unironically saying that you cannot possibly imagine any reason why someone might beef with a trans person besides being anti-trans or right-wing. That's a huge yikes from me.

    Trans people are people. They can beef with other people for a multitude of reasons that have nothing to do with being trans.

  • It’s really incredible how silently preventing other instances that use this front end from accessing the largest trans-centric instance on the fediverse (to my knowledge) isn’t transphobic

    It is not inherently transphobic, unless, again, you think anything bad happening to people who happen to be trans is inherently transphobic.

    but drawing attention to it is ‘malicious’.

    It's really incredible how you think it's okay to mislabel people as anti-Left and anti-Trans even when they aren't.

    No need to provide an actual reason for the silent blocking, it’s actually just bad faith to notice that’s going on.

    I never said there was no need to provide a reason ot that it's bad faith to notice it happening. Why are you making things up?

    What reason is there to ‘beef’ with Blahaj that isn’t centered in right wing or transphobic policies, or both?

    Is that all trans people/leftists are to you? They have no existence or relevance or opinions or actions that aren't explicitly about being trans/leftist? Yikes.

  • Who only has a blocklist of only leftist sites?

  • Again, Mia has a history of maliciously mislabeling people who are very clearly not as anti-Left and anti-trans.

    Unless you're actually saying that beefing with someone for any reason is transphobic as long as that person happens to be trans.

  • You can have all of a set inside another set.

    Sure, but just because you can doesn't mean you do, and it makes the strong positive claim extremely flimsy.

  • I see zero justification in the git commit for the addition of blahaj

    So? You not knowing the reason doesn't make it anti-Left or anti-Trans.

    and you have failed to offer any explanation other than ‘not transphobia’

    Right, because I'm not out here making strong positive claims about the devs motivations. I'm specifically criticizing those who are.

    Specifically Mia, who baselessly accused Rimu of this same thing fairly recently.

  • An anti-Leftist and anti-trans blocklist would not include a pro-Trump instance.

    A blocklist designed for a number of other reasons could.

    If the evidence for the claim that it's an anti-Left, anti-Trans blocklist is to look at the code and ignore the parts that don't fit that narrative, we can safely dismiss that claim.

  • Why? I didn't make any such claim.

  • Still waiting to hear what assumptions I made...

    pretending the headline is misleading

    I'm not pretending anything. The article does not substatiate the claim.

    Criticism of transphobia was censored, banned from being posted again based on the information we have so far.

    So then you should be able to easily answer my questions: When did they submit it for approval? What is the approval process? How long does it take? How do you know it won’t be approved?

    It is important that we be able to criticize unacceptable behavior.

    It certainly is.

  • You’re making more assumptions than I am.

    What assumptions have I made...?

    Where does it say they were allowed to repost their criticism?

    When did they submit it for approval? What is the approval process? How long does it take? How do you know it won't be approved?

    You could just admit you don't actually know, but you seem to want to dig your heels in instead.

  • defending transphobia right now

    It is amazing that you offered up a textbook example of what I accused you of right here.

    Absolutely nowhere have I defended transphobia. It's disgusting how often you try to discredit people using that tactic. It totally devalues real criticism of actual transphobia that hurts real people.

    And if we're comparing modlogs, apparently I'm in good company with a racist, violent troll.

  • The fact that it's on the list debunks your implication that it was an anti-leftist and anti-trans block.

    I wasn't ignoring anything. But you have a history of maliciously mislabelling people as anti-left and anti-trans, so worth pointing out that you're doing it here too.

  • Huh?

  • Ah yes, the famously leftist and trans-friendly instance: maga.place

  • But they did not provide a method for reposting the criticism

    They specifically said they submitted it for proper approval. No where does it say that was denied...

    they replaced it with a useless offer.

    You're inferring that. Were you there? Do you know what was discussed? Based on their statement, the ODPC seems to disagree with you.

    You can call me a shithead. And I can say… “No, you.”

    Or you could try actually defending your claim instead of hurling petty insults and attacking strawmen.

  • They literally asked for a post that was posted to their account without approval to be removed and go through the proper approval process.

    You want to pretend that's the same as "banning" criticism? I can't stop you from being wrong.

    But I can call you a shithead for supporting deceptive journalism. Shithead.