Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
1
Comments
166
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • You challenged Grandma. Grandma doesn't fight fair, and she's heard about packing heat and made it her own. You have to see it through now. Eat enough of her food and you'll be inducted into a secret order of endorphin lovers.

  • Goats are actually malevolent vegetables.

  • Put the side back on your case, and then you don't have to look at it. ;)

  • Ideally it doesn't. It just wastes a lot of enforcement time and energy chasing incorrect leads, and give those who voted for it a taste of what being on the receiving end is like.

  • Don't spam it with nonsense, just report your local republican voters for having a migrant housekeeper/gardener/nanny/lodger or similar. They wont believe it if you report the owner is a migrant and they have republican signs in-front of their house, but they'd have to investigate whether they employed a migrant.

  • It's not the buyer saying "I owe you", but the issuer of the currency (actually, usually just the notes, coins are considered to have value). The first person/entity to get the note gave, or promised, the issuer (usually the central bank) something of value, and the issuer gave them a token (note) saying the bank owes the holder of that note a certain amount of value. The recipient can then trade that note freely, as can future recipients, in the knowledge a vendor will accept it for its face value. So, yes, you're trading debt when you use money, but it's the bank's debt to the holder, not the debt of the buyer.

    Typically the bank issue money when someone takes a loan, i.e. promises that they will pay the bank the value of the loan plus interest.

  • Further research shows that they blew everything up trying to deal with the ancient, insatiable, worms they released on themselves out of curiosity. Upon reflection, it is probably better that we didn't arrive earlier.

  • We've got to leave something interesting for the alien xeno-archaeologists of the future to uncover.

  • I just wanted to say thank you for voicing a clear, coherent rebuttal of the knee-jerk, emotional "kill 'em" reactions we see so much. You're right that most who post that sort of thing are LARPing, and I really hope it's just a way to let off steam, but I worry that someone might try to carry out the threat, and do incalculable harm to the left in the process.

  • Even if they were surveilance drones they'd still be real, as opposed to mass hallucinations beamed into our visual cortexes by satellites. Of course, they're not actually surveilance drones, that's just a conspiracy theory started by the CIA to identify and monitor conspiracy 'super-spreaders' who can be used to spread whatever memetic trope the goverment of the day wants. No, really they genetically altered most plant species to act as resonant cavity bugging devices like The Great Seal. They monitor them with the same satellites they definately don't use to beam out mass hallucinations.

    /s of course, because, haha, that would just be silly, and I don't want to be picked up and 'reprogrammed'.

  • Oh birds are real. Very, very real. The question is, real whats?

  • Isn't one of the main issues with carbon-monoxide that hemoglobin preferentially binds with it over oxygen, and so it doesn't get expelled from your bloodstream via your lungs? You can tolerate quite large doses with little more than a headache, so I doubt you could overdose from internally generated amounts, but a large enough dose dangerously reduces your blood's oxygen carrying capacity.

  • Very gouda. You deserve a rind of applause for that one.

  • Maybe it's just a different viewpoint, but I find the sarcasm of that headline vastly more damning than just saying 'Trump lies again'. It basically saying that his brain is so fried that he's unable or unwilling to engage with the reality the rest of us experience.

  • Not morons, just not educated enough about them to understand exactly what the implications of that action are.

  • A suitably large catapult would deliver the necessary delta-v, not release pollutants into the atmosphere, and would make a satisfying 'sproing thump' noise in doing so.

  • Yes, I think the chicken would need to be rotating, you should use both hands to spread the warmed area, and be prepared to administer more slaps than were calculated.

  • You could say you just go round and round hunting for it, but no matter how hard you try you just can't corner it.

    Well, you could.

  • One must also consider the thermal conduction of the chicken. Slapping it, either once or multiple times, on a single area will impart energy to that area, raising the temperature there, but it will take time for that to disperse throughout the fowl. Thus will inevitably lead to the slapped area/areas being overcooked and the rest being dangerously undercooked. Losses to the environment must additionally be taken into account unless sufficient insulation is employed to mitigate this.