People already mass report to abuse existing AI moderation tools. It's already starting to be accounted for and I can't imagine it so much as slowing down implementing an anti AI rule if I'm being honest.
Just the threat of being able to summarily remove AI content and hand out account discipline will cut down drastically on AI and practically eliminate the really low effort 'slop', it's not perfect but it's damn useful.
I truly believe there exists media designed to get low info investors to make the wrong stock market moves and this is one. You can't sell a stock if someone else isnt buying it. This and people like Kramer insure the in the know people can offload stock onto rubes before everyone knows their toasted.
Big same. I can only assume one is in the works and likely the most anticipated piece of steam hardware. If we're lucky they'll be saving the news for the near future after these products gets their hype cycle. Marketers love to tease ya.
I see where you're coming from but can't say I agree with your conclusion. She had much more information and time to make her judgments about Cuomo than a typical woman has before they have to make a judgement call on people who could be dangerous. She's also very well paid, it's not as if Cuomo wouldn't have representation if she refused him. Despite this I really dont believe that sexual harassment/assualt can serve as some sort of punishment or some catalyst that sparks rehabilitation, or even positive change. I also don't believe physical or mental forms of violence can achieve those aims so maybe that's part of it.
Who's trying to find the correct racist term? Most I see here are people saying not to use the term brown to talk about Japanese people. Must have missed how that's racist.
The voters handed the dems huge gains during the shutdown election, there's no clearer way they could have signaled we were behind them, and yet they betray us.
Reread the passage again, the part that was widely asusmed was that the flip votes were operating on thete own. The sentence about Schumers approval was started with the phrase 'In fact' because that is what's being reported as the truth. 'Widely assumed' is not even the same sentence with the allegations on Chuck so Im having trouble interpreting your comment in good faith.
A professor who worked at the Boston Globe for 20 years before opening his own publication in 1990. Hes been a independent journalist since before most of Lemmy was born. Chuck knew and supported it. Or are you gonna ignore credible reporting that you don't like? We got a party for people like that in America.
Here’s what occurred. It has been widely assumed that the group of eight mostly centrist Senate Democrats, who have been looking to broker a hollow deal on Republican terms, were freelancing. In fact, they were acting with the express approval of Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and were reporting to him daily.
It seems either Leader Chuck Schumer conspired against the party at large, or they did have the support of Democrats.
I would assume that yes. The more progressive wing of democrats have been fed up with Chuck for a long time and so have a lot of the voters. Allowing riskier seats to have plausible deniability is the whole purpose of having the least risky seats be the ones to break. What worries me is Chuck is more than likely not the only one voting no now that there's enough yes votes but secretly in favor of it. How are we going to find those other people?
Here’s what occurred. It has been widely assumed that the group of eight mostly centrist Senate Democrats, who have been looking to broker a hollow deal on Republican terms, were freelancing. In fact, they were acting with the express approval of Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and were reporting to him daily.
Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of being ineffective and called for his removal.
In this article Seth Moulton calls for Schumers removal putting the blame on him, because he knows what Chuck was doing. He's far from the only Democrat calling our Schumer specifically for this.
They were picked to vote this way beause their seats are either not up for election next year or they're retiring. Schumer masterminded this but voted no himself in a form of fake resistance. We have to punish more than just this list or nothing changes. It's a big setup and they're trying to play us for fools.
Am I missing something or is exchanging money for something else just spending the money?