Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
4
Comments
145
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • No texactly. I drop the "Wassn scheiß"

  • Seems fair. There are many places for erotic/porn content on the web. And for a federated network it is good to not force instance owners to manage avoiding the hosting of nudity by federating it.

  • Whrere are you from?

    Because in Germany it is really common.

    I have been looking for a new contract for a while now, because my dsl is shit (thanks to my landlord). But all new cable contracts I can find are NATed (ecxept buisness contracts).

  • Fair, it is a lot harder, but possible (you could vpn your traffick through a vps). Actually one of the reasons I have not changed my terribly slow contract yet.

  • Not necessairly. In Germany CGNAT is quite common. So if one of OPs devices routes via IPv4, the traffic will be routed to the carriers public facing router. I would not consider that local as it physically leaves the cables you control.

  • Does your provider give you yoir own (not necessairly fixed, jus no one else having it simultaniously) IPv4-Address? Some keywords to look out for wrt that are NAT, or DS(dual stack)-lite.

  • Basically the traffic goes all the way out to whatever device has that public IP. It then is routed back.

    This would be a problem if OP has a provider who NATed him (which is quite common where he is from), right?

  • I think I was a bit unclear on that, I meant uncompressed rips as in I ripped the relevant media to unkompressed mkvs, I didn't save the entire disk dump. I also have mostly such rips, but also a bit of media from other sourches ™ which is already compressed. So I suspect my results would be even worse.

  • Thank you, I didn't know that, but that was the type of answer I was looking for :D.

    I only ripped the relevant media anyways, so no trailers to remove.

  • A bit offtopic: What theme is that? I was woundering why you would put windows screenshots under a comment about dolphin for a second.

  • Really? My banks use the best 2fa I've seen so far. You have a card-reader which generates a code based on some input values related to the transaction and the physical chip on my bank-card.

    (Although they have been pushing PuhsTan (app on phone) a lot recently :/)

  • I miss tom scot videos

  • DW started being discussed here – https://lemmy.world/comment/14345095

    It was first mentioned as a reply to that comment. It was first being discussed here :https://feddit.org/comment/4011934

    He didn't claim that tho? They are insinuating it. Why else would you mention that in a reply to a comment asking to prove a lack of credibility.

    Trump/Biden did not in fact hire/fire staff at US Agency for Global Media (USAGM)

    In the linked DW-article it says the administration hired/fired stuff. Which is arguably different then them doing it directly, although that is a bit pedantic I guess. My main point is that that alone does not makes RFA an unreliable source. I am using DW as an example because it exists in a similiar framework (directly appointed by a government administration) and yet is credible.

  • Tbf its not a given they don't also do this.

  • I googled around a bit and it seems the main concern is being seperate sowftware-wise, not mainly location wise (although thats a nice side effect). So mainly avoiding fun stuff like https://m.slashdot.org/story/112253.

  • I am just repeating a commonly used phrase with that tbh.

    I would Imagine it comes from the fact that a backup also safeguards agains other failures by creating more distance between the Copies. If you are hit by a ransomware attack Raid wont be much good. If your PSU sufers a failure, it might cause an overcurrent/voltage in both hdds. If you accidentally delete something it will be deleted on both drives, etc.

  • Why would it work difderently then here?

  • If you go that route I'd want to make sure the cpu is at least somwewhat recent.

    My first server was an old office PC I bought used as well, but I had real problems with it, because the CPU was lacking some X86 instructions which is why I could not run a specific service I wanted to as it used those. (And if you want to run jellyfin in the near future you should make sure to buuy a cpu that can also do some hardware encoding/decoding as doing that in software on a low end CPU can make the experience somewhat sluggish.