Skip Navigation

🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

@ muntedcrocodile @lemm.ee

Posts
12
Comments
1011
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • My argument is that plane travel is this safe despite TSA being so hopeless therefore the use of such speech will have no effect on actual safety and restricting it is an unnecessary restriction of liberty for no actual reason.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • Yeah I'd agree. I guess anyone just sounds more assertive than some. Perhaps I should have said most.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • I've dealt with xmpp and matrix and I far prefer using matrix tbh. XML is shit in all cases except prompting llms.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • Not even stealthily they just required some device validation bullshit iirc. Basically they require the ROM is signed by a Google certificate. They don't do that for custom roms even GrapheneOS after the android dev team request they get added multiple times.

    I'm on GrapheneOS so RCS isn't a solution for me.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • I'm looking forward to the day when I confederate my own fucking messaging server. But I doubt that'll ever come.

    I think a lot of the fediverse should introduce Matrix as part of their deployment for private messages directly.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • Okay, hear me out, but I think it's actually beneficial.

    Your content itself is encrypted, e2e so u don't need to worry about that.

    The signal protocol has recently introduced sealed sender. sealed sender is completely useless if all communications are going through a centralised server, such as the signal server (You can deanonimise senders easily). If the traffic travels across multiple servers with sealed sender, then it is theoretically impossible to reveal who the sender is unless you have communications with that other server give u info on who the sender was. So if you trust signal not to be collecting your metadata, then you must also trust them, not to be giving your metadata to metadata.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • I think that's only the case for people on a meta client. I would assume for people on a signal client get their requests proxied to meta via a signal server.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • Isn't the whole point of E2E encryption that it doesn't matter. And since signal has recently implemented sealed sender. Sending your communication to someone on a Facebook server might actually be more secure.

  • WhatsApp interoperability with Signal

    Jump

  • Well except that RCS is locked up by Google. I don't believe there are any foss implementations.

  • Stop Treating Phone Numbers As A Digital ID

    Jump

  • Don't u need an existing email to bootstrap that process.

  • What's the best place to buy a Trans/Pride Flag?

    Jump

  • Doesn't someone own the copyright and thus get royalties from the new one as opposed to the good ol rainbow.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • The second one, I don't see why you shouldn't be allowed to do that. Travel by plane is by far the safest form of transport. The TSA is actually like 90% ineffective. I mean if you do actually make a joke like that they'll tackle you to the ground and most likely shoot you but let's not let reality get in the way of a good philosophical discussion.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • I'd argue that there is no way you could ever come to a common understanding of what is hurtful.

    It's not that we're more individualistic than we used to be, it's just that we're now exposed to the entire global consciousness.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • I would probably define absolute free speech the same way you did. I've given you my definition of free speech. And some people call my definition absolute.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • Depends who says it. If Joe shmoe says it on Lemmy then id say its fine. If someone said it televised (and where knowledgeable of it being televised, if they are not then its the person televising it who is making it actionable and thus their fault) then it's actionable and thus u can't say it.

    I'd say the sentence is a direct incitement of violence. But its not always actionable.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • I doubt that most of them have the same interpretation of absolutists in this context that you do.

    I get called a free speech absolutist because I believe that you should be able to say anything that is not a direct incitement to actionable violence. Some would call that absolutist, I would not.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • I guess you could argue Karl Popper's paradox of tolerance would be an unsolvable logical error that would result.

    But also I would argue that anyone who is calling anyone else a free speech absolutist is misunderstanding what that other person stands for.

  • What problems would absolute free speech have?

    Jump

  • I find ur existence is harmful to my mental state. Therefore u existing is in violation of this rule.

    I like the idea but it had flaws

  • Apple pulls their AI, Valve talks SteamOS, Meta bans Fediverse Links_ Linux & Open Source News

    Jump

  • They are scared of the fediverse, and I like it.