What's a contact for this individual.
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 376
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 376
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- JumpRemoved
db0 is actual nazis?
No I just wanted to bait you into dismissing the social contract by saying its forced upon us by the state and not something i had any choice in consenting to.
Thus by your very own logic I would be perfectly justified in walking over to ur house breaking the social contract and shooting u in the face. I'm obviously not gonna do that cos the social contract forced upon me which ur taxes are funding against ur will goes to ensuring that I would spend the rest of my life in jail if I where to do such a thing.
This forces u into 1 of 2 positions either the social contract is valid and ur whole point is moot (stfu) or u think that just murdering someone for disagreeing on the internet is a valid response.
And u can't say u wanna keep some parts of the social contract but not others. U get ur chance to renegotiate the contract every couple years when u have an election.
Not agreeing with you is not called being stubborn its called a different perspective. You will find that almost everyone in the world has a different one and ur underhanded frame shifting techniques to changes those perspectives doesn't work on everyone.
I have given a clear argument for why ur implication of all animals is a stupid comparison either provide an argument against said points or shut up with that point.
So what if all my neighbours and I get together and make a decision that we don't want people from the neighbourhood over coming into our neighbourhood let's calk the group of neighbours and I a pack A and call the neighbourhood over pack B. Then pack A patrols our neighbourhood to ensure pack B doesn't come into our neighbourhood. Ohh shit that's literally what the fucking wolves are doing.
Rules, morality, the law all if it doesn't actually exist its all a fucking social construct upheld by he who holds the monopoly in violence. The state holds the monopoly on violence it has that monopoly on violence because it was given to them by a majority of the population of a nation (that's called democracy). If you don't like it you can campaign to change it or become the monopoly on violence and go do a coup (good luck with that). The monopoly of violence is the only law that actually exists and it is the very same law that governs us as what governs wolves. We are just smart monkeys who have abstracted this violence away and hidden it behind a facade of rules and laws and moral arguments.
You pay tax cos failing to do so will result in violence upon you at the hands of those who demand tax. You by accepting the social contract have consented to play by the rules so that the violence may be enacted against those that may threaten you. The state will use ur tax to enact violence against people coming into ur house and fucking up ur shit just that ur house happens to also include the entire society cos u don't live in an isolated environment outside of everyone else in ur society.
No I think you missed the point.
I did not miss ur point its just that I outlined why your point is not in fact the point u believe it to be.
The wolves don't have a state enforcing those rules. only the wolves are subject to those rules they made up.
The wolves have a pack that enforce those borders against other wolves. U have a nation that enforces those borders against other people. Same thing. Only the humans are subject to those rules.
Meanwhile, some humans made up human borders, and force all humans to abide by those rules. I never consented to those boundaries, yet the state will use violence to enforce them.
Some wolves made up those borders and force all other wolves to abide by those borders. Most wolves never consented to those borders yet a pack of wolves will use violence to enforce that border upon other wolfs> .
Furthermore, human made borders do often include infrastructure like fences and walls that will stop other animals from traveling freely.
That's a pointless distinction that only works as well as you are willing to maintain the parallel of human seeking to cross a border as another species to those that are enforcing the border. Given that almost all animals that are not subject to the wolves borders are lesser species than the wolves that's a wildly telling statement about how you view people seeking to cross your borders.
I feel your argument is implying that people subject to borders created by other are equivalent to animals being subject to borders created by other species. As as humans are just animals we do not subject birds to our human borders only other humans if we are to accept your argument birds are nots subject to borders created by wolves only borders created by wolves. I don't see how this is any different what humans do?
The whole point of your argument is to try justify why territories created by one species is not analogous to territories created by another species?
The wolves "agreed upon those boundaries" by fighting each other. Humans agreed on our boundaries by fighting eachother. Only that us humans have democracy so everyone gets a say not just whatever wolf happens to be in charge of any particular pack. Would that not make human boundaries a more equitable situation than that of wolves?
So my notes are just a directory of thousands of MD files. I wrote some code that watches the files in this dir to see when anything changes and when it does it will do the following:
- Splits the file into chunks with some overlap on each side it does something like 300token chunks with a 25token overlap this is done by loading the model tokeniser via the huggiface python library and using the huggingface chunker (this happens locally).
- I send each chunk to my local ollama instance that converts it to a semantic vector (just another local docker container)
- I then delete all semantic vectors in chromadb for that file and create new entries for the updated file.
- If /sydney is contained within the file it sends a message to the matrix chat as the user saying "read
<filename>
and follow the instructions provided by the /sydney command" the agent manager will then get this message and pass it off to an agent to handle. All this happens locally.
My ai agent is a separate component (just another docker container, with the notes dir mounted as a volume) using pi which uses an LLM via remote api (openrouters). I have a custom tool for that agent where the agent can write a text search that returns the top n most semantically similar chunks of text (along with some metadata notably the filename and line numbers where this chunk came from). The vectors are never seen by the LLM they exists purely for the search ranking. The agent also has file editing capabilities so it can then go read that file or modify that file like any coding agent. The agent also has a tool to send messages via matrix.
I have a service that watches a specific matrix chat and if a message is recieved does 1 of 2 things: Option 1: if an agent is already running it will pass the message into the existing agent as a user message. Option 2: if no agent is running it will start a new agent instance and pass the message into the agent as the user message. This agent manager service is the same docker image that runs the agent. This is the same docker container that runs the agent when the agent finishes running it takes and final agent output and sends that to the matrix chat as the agents matrix user.
I got an agent to write all this code so its probably dodgy as shit with all sorts of security holes hence I haven't published it on github (security through obscurity etc etc lol).
I also have a searxng instance running accessible to the agent via MCP. And I have a chrome MCP allowing the agent to do things from inside a virtual chrome browser.
Bro I signed up for openai's ai when it wasn't a thing yet 2years prior to chatgpt and they where saying its dangerous so only researchers get access to it same as mythos. I entered literal gibberish bullshit into a form and ticked a box promising not to use it for bad things and they gave me access so I doubt anthropic are going to be any more secure.
So I do inference over api to open routers I wish I had the GPU or an apple to run a decent LLM locally. Embedding is very cheap comparatively, I use a clip embedding model so I can have images and text in the same vectorspace.
Is this not part of the plan. I seem to recall they are designed to entirely burn up on reentry.
Rag is an outdated mechanism full agentic workflow is much better imo. I've written my own custom thing that uses a matrix account, pi, a vector embedder via local ollama, and vector store of chroma, the agent has custom tools to query the vector store, run bash etc. I have my logseq notes sync to my server via syncthing and I have a file watcher that updates the vector store as my notes change. The agent can edit notes like its any file. I then simply have a matrix client I can communicate to the agent with. I have it so the fuel what her looks for "/sydney" (that's my agents name) and it will send a message via matrix to get the agent to go look at that file/note and make changes as requested via the command. Its kinda openclawish but a lot less context heavy and doesn't run forever unless triggered.
I'm pretty sure ice is more diverse than every single protest against them.
Only proving that their is a market for this and supply will always come to meet demand eventually
U know a suspiciously large amount of information on that topic.
We don't get energy from the sun we get entropy
Implement portable actors and tell them to get bent
What's the difference between this and guys talking to of girls?