I was told that it was convention to use the highest government title that a person received once they leave government.
I have heard of that convention, but only in formal address (not in journalism or casual conversation). I don't know if it's official protocol anywhere or just an urban legend.
In this context, I think it's important to realize that he is not the president, that he was impeached twice, and that he is a convicted felon. His opinion does not and should not be given the same weight as that of The President of the United States.
Also, I don't see any reference to him at all in the article. It looks like OP is editorializing.
Matrix is probably the closest to Discord overall. If Element is bugging out on you, it might be worth trying other clients. Nheko worked well when I tried it, for example. Do note that the matrixorg homeserver is sometimes overloaded, so if you're having responsiveness issues, choosing or running a different homeserver will probably clear them right up.
Mumble.info is great for voice. If your text chat needs are pretty basic, it might be a good fit. I don't think it saves message history.
XMPP is a protocol, not an app. If you you saw an interface you didn't like, you could always just use a different client. I don't usually recommend it, since setting it up with all the features people usually expect is a bit complicated and error-prone, but it would probably be fine among a small group of friends if one of them has tech skills. I don't think it offers voice, at least not in any widely-supported way.
I read his message. He didn't seem grumpy or frustrated to me; just encouraging folks to use a certain style that's already in wide use, for reduced noise and better consistency.
With no context, this could be an honest attempt to learn about different tools, a thinly veiled set-up to promote a specific language, or an attempt to stir up drama. I can't tell which.
It's curious how such specific conditions are embedded into the question with no explanation of why, yet "memory safe" is included among them without specifying what kind of memory safety.
Okay, Henny Penny. Now that we see your judgment of major threats is worthless (and your motivations entirely profit-driven self-interest) we know that we should ignore you when you scream that the sky is falling.
Was this article funded by a would-be surveillance state? If not, I wonder what David Gilbert's headline will be when he learns that roads, telephones, postal services, and conference halls are also used by neo-nazis.
And Perl both still exists and is actively maintained, so it “lost prominence” rather than “died”.
Okay, but you're the one who called out "the demise of Perl". Have you changed your mind? I was just responding to your question.
For what it's worth, I think you were right about that: Perl is dead, in the sense of no longer growing or even maintaining the reach it once had. Other languages are overwhelmingly chosen for new code, while Perl has mostly fallen into disuse outside of people who learned it in its heyday and haven't moved on, and irrelevance outside of legacy systems. It might not be quite as much a dead language as Latin (which also still exists and sees some use) but it's well on its way there.
I see. You replied to me, though, with commentary that doesn't fit the question I was answering or the thoughts I was expressing. Don't you think it would have made more sense as a reply to OP?
It bothers me that we as a society continue to surrender our agency, our rights, and even our well-being to whatever restrictions a corporation makes up to benefit itself, just because they're in a (practically unavoidable) terms & conditions document.
It's getting so bad that people sometimes mistake corporate policies for law, crying "that's illegal" if someone steps outside the bounds of a software license.
Adding insult to injury, enforcement of these things is paid for by us, through taxes.
I have heard of that convention, but only in formal address (not in journalism or casual conversation). I don't know if it's official protocol anywhere or just an urban legend.
In this context, I think it's important to realize that he is not the president, that he was impeached twice, and that he is a convicted felon. His opinion does not and should not be given the same weight as that of The President of the United States.
Also, I don't see any reference to him at all in the article. It looks like OP is editorializing.