Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
1
Comments
191
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • They’re offering a 5 seat SUV body as well. Not a minivan, but, closer.

  • I mean, he still won a significant majority even with the vote split. And he won a majority In precincts that trump won In the election.

    A more interesting question is, if there had been a been serious candidate to the left of Harris in the general election, would she have polled more like coumo did?

    I don’t think it’s safe to assume that she would have won more votes than mamadani did in the same situation. And comparing the outcomes of a national 2 candidate race to a local 3 candidate race is not really telling you anything unless you introduce the counterfactuals and do polling to fill in those gaps.

    Right now we’re seeing a lot of polling showing democrat socialists candidates outperforming corporate democrats in a lot of battle ground and purplish red states. Arguably attempting to appeal to coumo type voters damaged Harris’s chances In battle ground states by alienating unaffiliated voters.

  • Yah, given that “training models” doesn’t stop when the model is finished and released. Like, a released model needs to be continuously tweaked to keep it up to date or to deal with problems that have occurred. Even if that’s not literally tokens used by customers, it is compute being used to provide service to customers.

    And that’s just assuming that they’re not just hiding some compute costs used to service customer demand inside the R&D budget. “Oh, you see, this pool of customers are being served with an experimental version, so any compute here is actually R&D, any API fees or subscription payments made by them of course get counted towards normal revenue.”

  • I mean. They do pay them in the form of taxes. And also in the form of small donor donations to campaigns.

    In some campaigns the large donations from rich donors are more significant than the total from small dominoes, but that’s not always the case.

  • To be clear, for those reading, the DSA is structured as a party and could act as an independent party if necessary, but they mainly run candidates in democratic primaries as they recognize that doing so is a more practical way to win elections in the short term.

  • The purpose of a system is what it does.

    So if you view the trump presidency as a system, then yes its purpose was to destroy the American political system and impoverish the working class.

  • So the the operating expense was greater than their revenue from operations by about 2, but it seems like they’re minimizing it by hiding the cost of some of the compute inside marketing and training costs. This is something that a few AI companies in China have been caught doing to make it seem like they’re doing better than they are. So they could be incinerating money at an even faster rate than they just admitted.

  • Yes I am an American and I know what he did, but I also know that the Breton woods agreement was only a small part of the financial system, and that realistically, the economic downturn of the 70s was far more heavily impacted by several oil shocks and the hangover from massive spending on Vietnam.

  • Damn, almost like, there was some sort of third party candidate splitting the vote in his election.

  • the Democratic Party is a lot less monolithic than people make it out to be, it’s just that a lot of influential people in the back end have been fighting to keep progressives out, arguing that they needed to stay close to republicans to win “moderate” voters.

    More visible progressive wins will erode that narrative and allow various parts of the coalition to abandon the neoliberal orthodoxy imposed on them by corporate consultants. We can’t get anywhere untill that dead weight is dropped. Maybe the Democratic Party won’t be the one to adapt to the new conditions, maybe something new will take their place, but nothing is going to happen till that narrative is dead.

  • Or at least different kinds of addling. Although, I suspect that algorithmic social media does less long term damage than persistent developmental lead poisoning (SERIOUSLY, WHAT THE FUCK? LEADED GASOLINE?)

  • Mild steps away from the neoliberal consensus are necessary perquisites to break the back of the propaganda machine.

  • The modern banking system and monetary policy was created under FDR. Nixon just stoped pretending it was backed on gold and told de Gaulle to kick rocks when he asked for the gold back.

    Realistically the changes under Nixon are peanuts compared to the digitization of it all since the introduction of systems like Swift.

  • “Oh, you don’t like the obvious and inevitable outcome of the war? THEN WHY DID YOU ASK FOR IT?”

  • I think the US admin is as much the one playing games here as Iran in regards to the peace deal. I think that trump wanted good news and figured he could get a bump from announcing a peace deal.

    And I do think Iran has had some pretty solid strategy here, direct attacks on civilian infrastructure in the US would probably generate some amount of public support for the admin, which would not be in Iran’s interest. The best leverage they have for winning the war is public opinion in the US In the lead up to the mid terms. That and pushing a wedge between the gulf states and the US.

    By focusing on the industrial targets in the gulf states, taking out oil infrastructure, hitting expensive military targets like AWACs planes, and just generally exhausting the US’s supply of interceptor missiles. They’re making this super painful for the US in a way the maximizes public discontent in the US while minimizing opportunities for the US media to propagandize.

    And they also need a very good peace deal, something that will be hard for trump to just back out of again in 6 months. They’ve been very clear on what they want and these constant delays have largely been down to the us admin basically ignoring everything they’re asking about, that and Israel refusing to be bound by any agreements the US makes. If anything the US admin has been playing stupid games by agreeing to negotiations and then just refusing to negotiate other than to demand more. I’ll be pretty surprised if the current deal that Iran is agreeing to goes though, I suspect this is just the US admin fishing for positive headlines to juice the market. Realistically the US is on a timer, if they can’t get at least some capacity going again before the strategic reserves of oil run out then we’re looking at the global economy going on life support.

    I’m not saying the leadership in Iran are some strategic masterminds, but they’re mildly competent and the decision makers in the US just… aren’t. Like, it’s pretty easy to win a game of chess when your opponent is a chimp that keeps eating it’s own pieces.

  • Me, quietly hoping that this drag on long enough for the oil reserves to hit 0 and the price to spike.

  • drivers install for you without having to find them

    Lmao, lol even. Imagine not having a monolithic kernel. Imagine having a micro kernel where drivers need to be installed.

  • Windows psyop

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I think it’s pretty obvious that you wouldn’t support any candidate in a US election, which means that you disliking one means basically nothing.

    Just say you don’t believe in electoralism and nock it off with the rhetorical nonsense, you’re not doing any good here or helping your cause.