I remember a case where the AI was not given credentials to the prod DB, was not instructed to do anything on the prod DB, but went through the operator's hard-drive, parsing docs until it found them, then proceeded to destroy the prod DB.
Of course it was sorry, as they always are (deeply, trust them, but no: no refund, loser!).
Well, actually deaf people would have a real use of this device, with the glasses giving them realtime visual clues of surrounding noise and voices, may be even realtime transcriptions?
Smartglasses without a camera would be useful to them.
If you piss him off, you get an instant tariff or "stop all relations with …" (see Spain).
Agreements may not hold well, but at least you have a default way of working when he's not having a tantrum.
Some managers would praise him for his "spirit", congratulate the rest of the team for their "sacrifice", and still not give anyone a bonus nor a raise, because "that's just the job!".
Russia's threat is real. Whether they need 5% or less could be discussed, but military spending is necessary. Plus if they're smart, that money stays in European's companies, jobs, etc.
Most european countries have embraced neo-liberalism at various paces. If they're short on money, they could tax their billionaires based on their wealth. They don't. No one does, therefore: it's a political ideology to have financial issues and cut through public services, healthcare, social support, etc.
My printer is not connected, its firmware is opensource, and use a VPN. I'm pretty sure whoever has bad intents will have no issue figuring out how to get a model and print it.
I believe this regulation would mostly impact casual 3D-printing enthusiasts who minds their privacy, and set a precedent to regulate what can be printed. I wouldn't be surprised if some people were watching this closely, thinking about banning spare parts models to repair appliances under an "IP" excuse.
There are so many precedent where freedom restrictions passed under the excuse of "terrorism", "protect the children", now "prevent murders" and later there is almost never a review of their efficiency, because when there is… the conclusion is appalling.
We're just slowly moving towards more control and less freedom.
I can sometimes excuse a voter to be ignorant and misled, up to a certain point.
I have absolutely no mercy for a lawmaker whose job is to educate oneself and vote bills based on one's understanding and representing a political point of view.
Before such a law is passed, there are debates during which I am sure other lawmakers and health professional warned about its consequences. And even if there were not, it was still her damn' job to find such people and educate herself.
She is the first line of responsibility. She voted the bill. If she's a willful ignorant, then she's just fucking incompetent at her job, and she should be removed. Period.
And if he's president, he will say he can't enact the tax because billionaires would flee the US.
We've had the same arguments in France. The economist who proposed the tax actually used data from the US to show that few rich people actually leave the place they're in, because that's where they live, meet people for business or pleasure, etc.
Nah, you meant it was because of Biden, surely, and maybe Obama too, right?