Identical twins are natural clones and most of them share their last name (at least at birth and in childhood). So there is a correlation you can't deny between being a clone and sharing a name. Destroyed by pure logic. Checkmate atheist
It's a convention just as letters and digits are. If you communicate with people, you better follow the convention they are used to or make it explicit when you don't. That is when your goal is to be understood of cause. Otherwise dkfurveekfifrhrvaakdjf I guess
I was reacting to the "Isaiah talks about Mary" part of your argument. I'm not a scholar either and I linked a very short video but in other contexts, Dan elaborates that the Greek has been used for a raped woman who therefore isn't a virgin anymore but the main meaning is virgin.
I'm not sure what your point was. I neither up nor downvoted your comment. But since the whole birth story is fabricated by arguably Christians, it either was by applying the mistranslation of Isaiah or, if the intended audience of the gospels understood it to mean "young woman", it was an even later invention. If your point is that Jesus wasn't the son of a virgin and never claimed to be, than sure.
Þorn and eð are both old English letters and there are people trying to bring them back.
Just for context, not to advocate it.