Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
1855
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • no, it does not. there is a rune that consumes amethyst but it's just for flavour, so you can give your spell a cost if you want.

  • malice

  • shout out to the trickster mod which is basically "what if magic is a lisp"

  • it sure sounds like it's trying to. although i agree it's probably intentionally hyperbolic.

  • but like... none of this makes the terminal more powerful.

    something like the Arcan lash/cat9 shell is a massive leap forward in terminal technology that may potentially completely change how we use it. it does this by understanding what makes the terminal productive: pipelining, batch processing and scripting.

    meanwhile this is just... a skin.

  • hey, it's been released for free! they can still get into it.

    although i'm more partial to 2004.

  • ...so they switched to a browser with a known history of breaching that trust?

  • what the fuck is wrong with you?

  • rocm is open source as well. amd have historically been the ones pushing for open standards in these things, probably because they've never been market leaders.

  • Removed

    It do be like that

    Jump
  • can't even wear a tie these days because of woke, it's a collar or nothing

  • really? sounds like a weird span of systems considering they share so little code. i'd like to read on how they did that.

  • the part that's safe is in the browser. it's a basic fact of how http requests work that you can just request data and then not read it.

    also, "task managering the popups"? unless i've missed some very weird development that has literally never worked, because popup windows are part of the parent process.

  • the main thing is that the system end-users interact with is static. it's a snapshot of all the weights of the "neurons" at a particular point in the training process. you can keep training from that snapshot for every conversation, but nobody does that live because the result wouldn't be useful. it needs to be cleaned up first. so it learns nothing from you, but it could.

  • get an ortho then

  • just map it to a layer bro

  • is this stackless?

    anyway, that's interesting! i was under the impression that they eschewed os threads because of the gil. i've learned something.

  • no, the difference was clear to me before. good for other readers though.

  • i see what you did där

  • no, they're just saying python is slow. even without the GIL python is not multithreaded. the thread library doesn't use OS threads so even a free-threaded runtime running "parallel" code is limited to one thread.

    apparently not!

  • the thread library is aping the posix thread interface with python semantics.