Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
1848
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • nah you're fine

  • i read "weak" in this context as "unmanly". as in, the concept of feeling things makes someone less of a man, that manliness is inherently tied to stoicism. which is a very common thing, and something that needs to be combated. using language that meatheads understand necessarily means losing some nuance and adding some bias.

  • that's when you get it in your eye during

  • sorry, but... does the label say "dream blindness"?

  • ironically they also put chemicals in alan that were supposed to turn him not gay

  • have you set a preferred language? if you do, lemmy filters posts in other languages

  • ifdb.org is good for this! i'd recommend Counterfeit Monkey or Lost Pig.

  • corruption of champions

  • oop hasn't been "hot" for 20 years.

  • both?

  • that was the stated goal, at first. to replace C for writing os services.

  • it works, yeah, but it only does so because of microsoft, and they don't want to let anyone else in.

  • based on his other works? absolutely not.

  • lift people up instead of pushing them down. we don't make fun of the language someone is using, we help them get better.

  • that just sounds like what i hear from react devs.

  • i think the wording of the original article was intentionally inflammatory, but "the purpose of a system is what it does". if shit-talking php causes women to leave the profession, it doesn't really matter what the intent was.

  • not directly, but trash-talking it and gatekeeping "real programming" from the language most likely to be used by women is not exactly conducive to improved equality in the profession.

    i realise now that i didn't explicitly mention my point in the first post, so:

    • shitting on other people's jobs is bad.
  • it's what html was designed for. there's nothing icky about it. with htmx et al the serverside web is coming back in a big way so we can finally drop this react stuff.

  • my entire way of reasoning about programming languages changed when i read on article about how hating on php was misogynistic. i clicked on it because it just sounded like yet another ragebait, but it made sense.

    basically, since php is simple, and integrated with html, the vast majority of php devs started out as designers who later got into code. since php has always been a mess, nobody wanted to build mainstream tooling for it except the people actively working with the language. this means that mainstream ideas about language and tooling design didn't percolate down to php like it has done to most languages. so php devs, when exposed to tooling the rest of the world takes for granted, are usually overwhelmed because not only is there a lot of it, nobody in php-land uses tools like that. so they get called bad devs of a bad language. some of them, who really like to code, push through this massive difficulty spike, while others just assume that "actual programming" is too hard and go back to design, even though tooling usage has little to do with your skill as a programmer.

    the kicker, of course, being that web design has more women than most other dev specialisations.