Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
0
Comments
414
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • LoL no, of course it's not. Have you read some of the comments here? My crap doesn't even compare.

    But it's a matter of attitude towards life. I made a shitpost here, but I'm not drowning in down votes because of it. Few as it may be, people weren't offended (mostly) and even quietly appreciated it a little. On the other hand in that other spot, I did start shit, but enough people happily jumped in to poke it further... And that says something.

    Now I'm not saying your way of seeing things is wrong, it's a trek like any other. But if you don't recognize shit when you look at it and even poke it with a stick, can't blame the stink for wafting over. (Just as i wouldn't blame any reasonable action taken against me due to posting that shit in the first place.)

    Life sucks. It's shit. It stinks terribly. And making fun of that should be a basic human right.

  • As in assuming you are starting with an unbiased point of view.

  • Stress test it. Low, average, high, impairment conditions, safeguards off, order, chaos and everything in between.

  • I don't know why you assume there has to be a gotcha, maybe it's the competitive background... Anyway, it's visual because you look at it to see it. And it's not the best human performance vs best LLM performance, it's best controlled performance because the testing is limited to a set of parameters.

  • 🤔 So this is a visual comparison between peak performance of some humans and peak performance of current LLMs in a controlled environment?

  • Apparently, I am fighting a pointless battle against some random users in Technology due to a shitpost. I was on the defensive, but I made some more replies, so I guess I'm on the offensive now. I'll probably be on the defensive again once they reply or I get banned. We'll see how it goes.

  • If it studies something, it's a study. If you feel defensiveness, you consider aggression. If you feel bias in one way, someone can feel bias in another way. If there's an action, there's a reaction.

  • "Humans score 100%. Frontier AI scores 0.26%."

    The title deals in absolutes.

  • Biased study. Take any average person off the streets and shove this thing in their face. That 100% notion will go down fast.

  • That's standard Hollywood time, because anything closer to real life would be boring.

  • Ah, you too live in a trash can and crave cookies?

  • I applaud your dedication. Wish I had a similar one. Sadly, I usually just dump them in the washing machine..

  • Decent pay and benefits or just minimal pay and no benefits?

  • That's an easy one. They did a stint at a British museum for a century or so.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Depends on the studio, the movie, the budget, the people in charge being knowledgeable enough and the Egyptian music itself.

  • Hmm...

    If you don't have diabetes, you're about to. Also, you should check your pancreas just in case.

    As I understand it, mosquitoes love those with sugary issues and can be used as "sniffers" for those predisposed to diabetes.

    As for the pancreas, it's always a good idea to keep current with its situation as it likes to suffer in silence and only airs its troubles once it's too late.

  • Nightshade doing nightshade things.

  • Here's the thing though. These complex systems are built on errors and with each layer added on top, the errors keep multiplying. Some of the people quoted in the article understand that it will all come tumbling down one day, but the proponents don't care because it won't come down on them.

    So what I'm actually getting from the article is "Yolo! Not my fucking problem, bruh!".

  • Anyone remember which country had an inflation so bad, it issued trillion dollar bills useful only as toilet paper?