Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
1
Comments
88
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • iirc that was the cause of the original drop safety issues and the more recent uncommanded discharges are still unknown

  • That's not the gun just going off, it went off because the trigger was pulled due to not being in a holster.

    Anyways, we're just arguing the semantics of uncommanded discharges vs accidental discharges

  • Even if it was an accident, he:

    • handled a gun after drinking
    • violated multiple fundamental rules of gun safety
      • don't point at anything you aren't willing to destroy
      • finger off the trigger until intending to shoot

    Anyone who would do a single one of these things, let alone all of them, isn't responsible enough to own firearms, and should be prohibited from handling them.

  • Nah, even if it was an accident he:

    • handled a gun after drinking
    • violated multiple fundamental rules of gun safety
      • don't point at anything you aren't willing to destroy
      • finger off the trigger until intending to shoot

    That's bare minimum reckless endangerment and manslaughter.

    Anyone who would do a single one of these things, let alone all of them, isn't responsible enough to own firearms.

  • And violate at least another fundamental safety rule to have it hit someone.

  • Reckless endangerment / manslaughter is a bare minimum. You'd have to violate multiple basic safety rules for this to happen even following his story

  • These are talking about fundamentally different things than guns just going off, people generally use that term to talk about stuff like the p320, not people being idiots and causing negligent discharges.

  • Wasn't one of the theories that it had tolerance stacking issues and part wear that made it worse?

    I'd count that as poor quality

  • A lot of modern handguns guns don't have safeties, to the point I often don't even see that included as a rule anymore.

    But yeah, even if there wasn't intent, the recklessness is enough to get him on manslaughter at the very least.

    You have to violate multiple basic safety rules for this to even be possible

  • Yeah, you're violating multiple of the basic gun safety rules if a gun accidentally goes off and kills someone. (p320 excluded)

    If those aren't so drilled into your mind that it's instinct not to violate them, you aren't responsible enough to have a gun.

  • It could download time based averages alongside the map date, not perfect but decent most of the time.

    Really though this is an OSM wrapper so it would likely need to be integrated there

  • People said this about movies too, don't be too optimistic

  • Have you ever considered: fuck the supreme court, they're wrong

  • Eh, sometimes, a lot of lab goggles are vented and only really designed to block liquid splashes

  • VP is also prohibited, would have to be speaker of the house as 3rd in line

  • You do know you can read the article to find that out instead of assuming, right?

    This is a completely different monitoring system called Foodnet

  • Y'all really need to read past the headline:

    the bug that Paul found seemingly wouldn't be triggered anyway, as the relevant section of the code wasn't being called to begin with

  • I don't think a statement is really needed here, this wasn't a vulnerability, the code was never called. Even if the code were called, the $10,000 bounty is for a different type of bug entirely too

  • Oh 100% American gun culture is absolutely insane

  • Not The Onion @lemmy.world

    Trump seen pocketing FIFA medal before handing Chelsea replica championship trophy

    www.the-independent.com /news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-winners-medal-fifa-club-world-cup-b2789441.html